Back

Designing spatial adaptive surveillance for the emerging malaria vector Anopheles stephensi in Eastern and Horn of Africa

Sedda, L.; Ochomo, E.; Tadesse, F.; Khaireh, B. A.; Demissew, A.; Demisse, M.; Getachew, D.; Guelleh, S.; Ibrahim, M. M.; Abongo, B.; Moshi, V.; Muchoki, M.; Polo, B.; Kipingu, A. M.; Mlacha, Y. P.; Sangoro, O.; Adeleke, M.; Adeogun, A. O.; Ayodele, B.; Okumu, F. O.; Pang, X.; Ferguson, H. M.; Kiware, S.

2026-03-06 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.05.26347695 medRxiv
Show abstract

The spread of Anopheles stephensi into the Horn of Africa represents one of the main challenges for malaria control, given the species ecological plasticity and resistance to multiple insecticides. In response to the World Health Organizations 2022 vector alert, an adaptive, model-based spatial surveillance framework was developed and evaluated to improve detection, mapping accuracy, and operational responsiveness during invasion. Adaptive surveillance utilises initial observations to guide subsequent surveillance, linking the surveillance design to the underlying geographical characteristics of Anopheles stephensi distribution through observed data. This dynamic approach targets areas of high uncertainty and/or abundance, making the design responsive rather than predetermined. Focusing on Djibouti and selected regions of Ethiopia and Kenya, the adaptive surveillance was designed on previous in-country Anopheles stephensi surveillance data integrated with assembled open-source environmental, epidemiological, and demographic covariates. Key driver factors of the average monthly Anopheles stephensi catches varied geographically, although seasonality was universally important. Adaptive site allocation was optimised using a multicriteria target function which combines the trapping probability and uncertainty from previous surveys, with a simulation based on peaks-over-threshold (generalized Pareto) modelling of exceedances and Bayes factor-guided prioritisation. The selected adaptive surveillance design is the one that minimise the uncertainty in Anopheles stephensi trapping probability in hotspot areas. Optimal adaptive designs required between 50 to 59 sites per country, with uncertainty reductions in the probability of trapping projected up to 36% in Djibouti and more than 60% in Ethiopia and Kenya, with more than 60% site implementation halving uncertainty in Djibouti and Kenya and reducing it by up to 75% in Ethiopia. The proposed adaptive surveillance framework operationalises WHO guidance, accelerates hotspot identification, and inform targeted ecological studies and control interventions. It is extensible to other urban vectors (e.g., Aedes aegypti), enabling integrated, cross-border surveillance essential to contain Anopheles stephensi during ongoing invasion.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.3%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
6
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.2%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
10
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
Journal of Medical Entomology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
15
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
16
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
17
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
20
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
21
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%