Epidemiology of malignant hyperthermia in the UK 1988-2025: implications for prevalence, mode of inheritance, relative risk associated with RYR1 genotypes and in vitro contracture test phenotype
Hopkins, P.; Aboelsaod, E. M.; Daly, C.; Fisher, N.; Hobson, S. J.; Garland, H.; Gupta, P. K.; Bilmen, J. G.; Shepherd, S.; Robinson, R. L.; Shaw, M.-A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere is disparity between the incidence of malignant hyperthermia (MH) reactions and the prevalence of variants in the RYR1 gene associated with susceptibility to MH (where susceptibility is determined by in vitro contracture tests). Our aims were to use clinical and genetic data from the UK to explain this disparity and to examine if these data are consistent with the clinical risk of MH being inherited as an autosomal dominant trait. MethodsClinical MH and genotyping data were extracted from the UK MH registry. The numbers of general anaesthetics delivered in the UK were estimated from national surveys and reports, with population data obtained from government statistics. The prevalence of RYR1 variants in the UK population was estimated using UK Biobank data. The incidence of MH reactions 1988-93 was used to estimate the prevalence of the clinical risk of MH in the UK. Bayesian modelling, calibrated against actual data, was used to evaluate the likely mode of inheritance of the clinical risk of MH and the relative risk of clinical MH associated with different RYR1 variants. ResultsThe probability of index cases developing MH with each general anaesthetic can be expressed as a constant hazard of 0.46 (95% CI 0.42 - 0.50, n=375). We used peak incidence data (1988-93) to estimate the prevalence of the risk of MH as 1 in 44,000 (95% credibility interval, 1 in 40,000 to 1 in 48,000). The incidence of MH has declined over the past 22 years but the rate of decline is inconsistent with autosomal dominant inheritance (P < 10-10). The risk of MH varied by up to 150-fold between carriers of 28 recurrent RYR1 variants. ConclusionThese findings support a threshold inheritance model for clinical MH and have implications for diagnostics, both genotyping and in vitro contracture test phenotyping.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of female sex on anaesthetic awareness, depth and emergence: A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- DALES - a prospective cross-sectional study of incidence of penicillin allergy labels, risk of true allergy and attitudes of patients and anaesthetists to de-labelling strategies 92%
- Effect of Telemedicine Support for Intraoperative Anaesthesia Care on Postoperative Outcomes: The TECTONICS Randomised Clinical Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- S-ketamine in patient-controlled analgesia with oxycodone improves analgesia in a dose-dependent manner after major lumbar fusion surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 90%
- An assessment of the value of deep neural networks in genetic risk prediction for surgically relevant outcomes 90%
- The impact of changing smoking habits and smoke-free legislation on orofacial cleft incidence in the United Kingdom: evidence from two time-series studies 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Features of 16,749 hospitalised UK patients with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol 91%
- Risk Of Hospitalisation With COVID-19 Among Teachers Compared To Healthcare Workers And Other Working-Age Adults. A Nationwide Case-Control Study 91%
- Increased hazard of mortality in cases compatible with SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/1 - a matched cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Folic Acid And Methotrexate Use And Their Association With COVID-19 Diagnosis And Mortality: An Analysis From The UK Biobank 89%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 89%
- Development and validation of multivariable prediction models for adverse COVID-19 outcomes in IBD patients 88%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.