Functional Locality-Aligned Learning Reveals Structure-Function Causality in Enzyme Kinetics
Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Kang, M.; Zhang, K.; Yang, T.; Zheng, N.
Show abstract
Accurate estimation of enzyme kinetic parameters is essential for enzyme engineering and industrial biocatalysis, yet their experimental measurement remains labor-intensive and costly. Although machine learning offers an efficient alternative, existing methods still struggle to generalize to unseen enzymes and substrates. In particular, current three-dimensional (3D) structure-aware approaches rely on whole-enzyme 3D geometric structures and neglect substrate 3D geometry, often yielding limited or even degraded performance. We identify a fundamental limitation underlying these methods: a mismatch between the structural representation learning scale and the functional locality scale, which weakens structure-function causality in enzyme kinetics. To address this issue, we introduce EnzymePlex, a functional locality-aligned framework that aligns inductive biases with the localized structural determinants of enzyme function by prioritizing catalytic pockets, integrating substrate 3D geometry, and modeling nuanced enzyme-substrate interplay under the guidance of pocket-level structural priors. EnzymePlex achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks and substantially improves generalization under stringent out-of-distribution evaluations. Beyond predictive accuracy, EnzymePlex learns mechanistically aligned representations, with attention enriched at catalytic pocket residues and substrate reaction centers despite receiving no explicit super-vision for either. Moreover, when applied to recently reported wet-lab data, EnzymePlex effectively prioritizes high-activity enzyme variants and identifies potent inhibitors, highlighting its potential to accelerate enzyme engineering and drug discovery.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.