Back

A high-throughput method for measuring fungal growth rate on solid media using automated imaging and deep learning

Kristensen, T.; Dam, E. B.; De Fine Licht, H. H.

2026-03-05 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.04.709619 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Measuring the growth rate of filamentous fungi is an essential phenotype assay in fungal biology, enabling the comparison of nutrient-related fitness metrics across various isolates, species and genera. Conventional methods are time consuming and labor intensive, which prohibits the adaptation and implementation of high-throughput phenotyping. Here, we suggest a high-throughput methodological pipeline to study fungal growth on solid media combining the use of 24-well plates, an automated image acquisition system, and human assisted deep learning analysis of acquired images. Training a deep learning model through an iterative process - with continuous feedback and corrective annotations - enabled the development of a satisfying model that automatically segments pixels belonging to either fungus or background within a few hours. We evaluated this deep learning model by applying it to two test sets: First, a set of 336 images was used to validate the results by comparison with manual measurements. We demonstrate that the automated segmentation approach provides robust estimation of fungal growth not significantly different to manually segmented data. Second, a larger test set consisting of 2,016 images was used to illustrate the scalability of the model. After training the model for less than two hours, the deep learning model segmented the entire image data set automatically within minutes. The presented method is easily scalable and adjustable to other fungi and growth morphologies, due to the interactive training. Moreover, by combining 24-well plates and automatic image acquisition, measurements can be sped up as growth is detected across a smaller surface area than a standard six or nine cm diameter petri dish. The proposed methodological pipeline thus offers a new tool for estimating fungal growth rates, which can accelerate measurements, reduce bias, and increase throughput.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.5%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
7
Yeast
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
9
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
11
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%