Back

Contact calling is predicted by cooperative relationships in vampire bats

Vrtilek, J. K.; Gmutza, H.; Decker, S.; Carter, G. G.

2026-03-05 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.03.04.709596 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Group-living animals often coordinate their behavior using "contact calls". Identifying the function of these calls requires testing whether they are intended for any group member or targeted to specific preferred associates. If contact calling is used to coordinate with preferred associates, then higher rates of contact calling are expected between group members with a history of more frequent affiliation and cooperation. To test this hypothesis, we constructed a contact-calling network using synchronized recordings of vocal interactions between all 28 possible pairs of 8 female common vampire bats with well-sampled histories of social grooming and regurgitated food sharing. Bayesian multilevel models show that pairwise rates of contact calling were clearly predicted by social grooming and cooperative allofeeding rates in ways not explained by kinship. These findings show that common vampire bats use contact calls to coordinate with specific same-sex associates, unlike other studied bat species where individuals produce contact calls at similar rates towards different group members. We also found that, compared to white-winged vampire bats, common vampire bats are ten times less likely to rapidly respond to a contact call; this suggests yet-to-be-discovered differences in social behavior between vampire bat species. Finally, we discuss implications for the vocal grooming hypothesis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.9%
2
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.7%
8
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
11
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
17
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
29
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%