Back

The Role of Magnetic and Celestial Cues in Orientation and Navigation of Red Underwing (Catocala nupta), a European Migratory Moth

Pakhomov, A.; Dreyer, D.; Zechmeister, T.; Mouritsen, H.; Kishkinev, D.

2026-03-07 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.03.04.709557 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nocturnal migration is a remarkable phenomenon observed in many insect species, including moths. Migratory moths are capable of maintaining precise directional orientation during migration, as demonstrated in both laboratory and field studies, suggesting that they use multiple environmental cues for orientation and navigation. Recent studies on Australian Bogong moths revealed that these animals can use stellar cues and likely the geomagnetic field (in conjunction with local visual cues) to select and maintain population-specific migratory direction. However, the underlying orientation mechanisms used by most other migratory moths are still largely unresolved. Further, it remains unclear whether migratory moths can adjust their orientation using Earths magnetic field parameters for determining their position relative to the goal (i.e. location or map information) - an ability clearly shown in some migratory birds which respond to virtual magnetic displacements by correcting their orientation (experiments when animals are exposed to magnetic cues corresponding to other geographic locations). Here, we present results from virtual magnetic displacement experiments conducted on red underwings (Catocala nupta). In addition, we tested their orientation under simulated overcast conditions and in a vertical magnetic field to get indications whether this species relies on geomagnetic or celestial cues to maintain its population-specific migratory direction. Our results show that (1) red underwings did not compensate for virtual magnetic displacement, indicating the absence of a magnetic map; (2) they remained significantly oriented in the absence of geomagnetic information, suggesting the use of a stellar compass; and (3) there was no evidence of magnetic compass orientation in absence of any visual cues.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
2
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
6
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Journal of Insect Physiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
10
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
12
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
14
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
16
Insect Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Journal of Medical Entomology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%