Back

Evolutionary algorithms accelerate de novo design of potent Nectin-4-specific cancer biologics

Tan, E.; Frechen, S. C.; Broske, B.; Messmer, J. M.; Kempchen, T. N.; McEnroe, B. A.; Ferber, D.; Waluga, L.; Below, E.; Hoch, A.; Yong, M. C.; Oldenburg, J.; Rühl, H.; Geyer, M.; Toma, M. I.; Klümper, N.; Bald, T.; Schmid-Burgk, J. L.; Hölzel, M.; Hagelueken, G.

2026-03-06 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.04.709551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advances in AI-based structural biology have made de novo protein binder design increasingly effective, yet performance remains highly target dependent. For instance, the cancer surface antigen Nectin-4, an immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion protein, proved particularly challenging for RFdiffusion-based minibinder generation, yielding substantially fewer high-quality candidates than related targets. To address this bottleneck, we integrated an evolutionary genetic algorithm (GA) with AI-driven design. GA selection with tunable stringency was coupled with diversification via partial diffusion or direct sequence editing, enabling efficient exploration of sequence-structure space and rapid enrichment of promising candidates. This AI-GA pipeline quickly produced large and diverse minibinder panels with very good in silico quality metrics and is compatible with inputs from multiple design algorithms. Pooled, large-scale experimental screening identified highly stable Nectin-4 minibinders with single-digit nanomolar down to subnanomolar affinities. Lead binders were further engineered into Nectin-4-specific flow cytometry detection reagents and potent bispecific T cell engagers, demonstrating functional activity beyond binding. Together, these results show that evolutionary refinement can unlock challenging targets and accelerate de novo protein design for next-generation cancer biologics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.