Back

The FUL-SHP-AP2 module regulates fruit development in petunia

Bemer, M.; Chambrier, P.; Hernandez Ciro, N.; Morel, P.; Thoris, K.; An, E.; Rodrigues Bento, S.; Vandenbussche, M.

2026-03-06 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.04.709543 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fruit development is a typical angiosperm feature that greatly facilitates seed dispersal. Despite extensive studies on the gene regulatory network underlying pod shattering in the dry Arabidopsis fruit and the ripening process in the fleshy tomato fruit, it is yet unclear if a conserved regulatory network acts in early fruit development. Here, we investigated the roles of Petunia x hybrida (petunia) FRUITFULL (FUL), SHATTERPROOF (SHP) and APETALA 2 (AP2) homologs, three types of transcription factors repeatedly associated with fruit development and/or ripening. Petunia is closely related to tomato but produces dry dehiscent fruits like Arabidopsis. Our functional analysis revealed that the three petunia FUL-like genes, PETUNIA FLOWERING GENE (PFG), FLORAL BINDING PROTEIN 26 (FBP26) and FBP29, redundantly regulate endocarp development. They promote the formation of regularly shaped inner endocarp cells, probably via auxin/brassinosteroid signalling and cell wall modification. Furthermore, we discovered that the SHP-like gene FLORAL BINDING PROTEIN 6 (FBP6) has an opposite role, promoting more mesocarp-shaped endocarp cells, indicating that the FUL-like and SHP-like genes act antagonistically in early pericarp development. Finally, we show that the AP2-like genes REPRESSOR OF B-FUNCTION 1 (ROB1), ROB2 and ROB3 are crucial factors in petunia fruit development. rob1 rob2 rob3 mutants completely fail to dehisce and show major defects in pericarp patterning. The ROB transcription factors repress the activity of the FUL-like genes, and have, together with FBP6, an opposite effect on auxin and brassinosteroid signalling genes. Our study suggests that a module consisting of antagonistically acting TFs, including co-orthologs of AP2, FUL and SHP, regulates early pericarp patterning, at least partially via auxin and brassinosteroids.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
2
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.6%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.6%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
7
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
8
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
13
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.4%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
21
Plant Reproduction
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
25
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
28
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%