Back

Physics-informed stereology for estimating placental diffusive exchange capacity

Mcnair, R.; Whitfield, C. A.; Poologasundarampillai, G.; Jensen, O. E.; Chernyavsky, I. L.

2026-03-06 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.04.709535 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionStereological estimates of villous membrane thickness and surface area are widely used to infer the diffusive exchange capacity of the human placenta. A key geometric determinant of exchange capacity can be expressed as an effective diffusive length scale. Here we combine virtual histological sections with computational modelling in realistic villous geometries to assess the accuracy of classical stereological estimates of this diffusive length scale. MethodsTwo terminal villi, reconstructed from three-dimensional imaging, were digitally sectioned to generate random two-dimensional geometries containing fetal capillaries and surrounding villous tissue. For each section, we simulated steady diffusive transport between the fetal capillary and intervillous space boundaries to obtain a physics-based diffusive length scale as a reference case. Using the same geometries, we applied standard line-intercept stereology to measure harmonic-mean barrier thickness and boundary-length densities, from which a stereological estimate of diffusive length scale was derived. ResultsAcross both villi, stereology systematically overestimated the diffusive length scale by approximately 15-25%, depending on villus and section. We identified sources of this discrepancy, including interface curvature and assumptions underpinning the stereological correction factors, using idealised models of villus structure. ConclusionThese findings highlight the need for stereological approaches that account for curvature when interpreting placental structure-function relationships.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
6
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
9
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
11
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
12
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
14
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
17
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
27
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%