Helmet Use Among E-Bike, Pedal Bike, and E-Scooter Riders in Canberra: Retrospective Data Analysis of Head Injury Presentations (Phase 3)
Silburn, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundHelmet use is a proven safety measure that reduces the risk of head injury among cyclists and e-scooter riders. Despite legal requirements for pedal bikes and e-bikes in Australia, compliance varies, particularly among users of electric vehicles. The growing popularity of e-bikes and e-scooters in urban areas presents new public health challenges, yet observational data on helmet use, behavioural determinants, and the effectiveness of safety interventions remain limited. AimPhase 3 of the Helmet Use in Canberra study aims to characterise head injury presentations associated with cycling and e-scooter use and examine their association with helmet use and injury severity. MethodsDe-identified emergency department records from The Canberra Hospital will be retro-spectively analysed for presentations involving cycling or e-scooter-related head injuries during the study period. Extracted variables will include age, sex, vehicle type, documented helmet use, injury diagnosis, severity indicators, and date/time of presentation. Descriptive statistics will summarise injury patterns, while regression analyses will evaluate associations between helmet use and injury severity, controlling for demographic and contextual factors. Sensitivity analyses will address missing helmet data and subgroup differences by vehicle type, age, and gender. Expected ResultsIt is hypothesised that lower helmet use will correlate with higher rates and greater severity of head injury presentations. Findings will provide a population-level perspective on helmet effectiveness, inform local injury prevention strategies, and guide public safety interventions. Trial RegistrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) [ACTRN12626000245392]
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 International Border Surveillance Cohort Study at Toronto’s Pearson Airport 92%
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 92%
- The effectiveness of Ear Nose and Throat outreach programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians: a systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiological Patterns of Motorcycle-Related Injuries in Cameroon: A Comparative Analysis of Motorcycle Users and Pedestrians 94%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 91%
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lessons Learned From the Implementation of a Participant-Collected, Mail-Based SARS-CoV-2 Serological Survey in Massachusetts, USA 90%
- InterMob: A 24-month randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness-raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France 90%
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of a Night Travel Ban Policy on Road Traffic Accidents: Interrupted Time Series evidence in Zambia 92%
- Spatially regulated designs of incidence surveys can match the precision of classical survey designs whilst requiring smaller sample sizes: the case of snakebite in Sri Lanka 90%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation in Sierra Leone 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.