Back

Data-driven profiles of psychosis stages reveal distinct and overlapping clinical, cognitive, and neuroanatomical phenotypes

Danyluik, M.; Ghanem, J.; Bedford, S. A.; Aversa, S.; Leclercq, A.; Proteau-Fortin, F.; Eid, J.; Ibrahim, F.; Morvan, M.; Turner, M.; Piergentili, S.; Reyes-Madrigal, F.; de la Fuente Sandoval, C.; Livingston, N. R.; Modinos, G.; Joober, R.; Lepage, M.; Shah, J. L.; Iturria Medina, Y.; Chakravarty, M. M.

2026-03-05 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.04.26347618 medRxiv
Show abstract

Psychotic disorders are increasingly recognized as the extreme end of a progressive psychopathology continuum, with less advanced stages including the asymptomatic familial high-risk state (FHR), the help-seeking clinical high-risk state (CHR), and first episode psychosis (FEP). However, we lack a comprehensive study of clinical, cognitive, functional, and neuroanatomical markers across all three early stages of psychosis, limiting our understanding of how the multimodal phenotypes which define psychotic disorders emerge in the broader course of psychopathology. We leveraged a sample of 70 FEP, 40 CHR, 43 FHR, and 41 healthy participants recruited from the same clinical and sociodemographic setting - the first such dataset to be described in the literature. Several markers were elevated in CHR but did not worsen in FEP, including depression/anxiety and difficulties functioning, while FEP was uniquely defined by cognitive impairments and cortical thickness reductions characteristic of those seen in schizophrenia. Across the sample, the dominant axis of joint brain-behaviour variability captured a relationship between reduced cortical thickness and lower cognitive performance, a pattern which was equally established in both CHR and FEP. Initial longitudinal data revealed that depressive and negative symptoms best predicted lower functioning at 6-month follow-up, regardless of group status. Together, our analysis suggests that affective and functional disturbances emerge in earlier stages of psychosis, while cognitive and anatomical abnormalities characterize more advanced ones - though the overlap we observed across groups demonstrates that clinically relevant phenotypes can cut across group boundaries, requiring personalized care to manage.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.3%
3
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
4
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
7
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
13
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
22
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%