Back

Generative AI designs functional thiolation domains for reprogramming non-ribosomal peptide synthetases

Buelbuel, E. F.; Bang, S.; Geroge, K.; Bianchi, G.; Raj, P.; Chung, S.; Pauline, V.; Hochstrasser, R.; Minas, H. A.; Elgaher, W. A. M.; Kany, A. M.; Hirsch, A.; Schmitt, S.; Heinz, D. W.; Kalinina, O. V.; Klakow, D.; Bozhueyuek, K. A. J.

2026-03-04 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.03.03.709401 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Large language models and generative protein design promise to accelerate biotechnology, but it remains unclear whether they can engineer dynamic megasynth(et)ases whose activity depends on transient, context-specific domain interfaces. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) are an especially demanding target, yet a high-value one because they produce many clinically important natural products and offer a route to analogs that are often difficult or impractical to access by chemical synthesis. Here we integrate pretrained generative models (ESM3, ProteinMPNN and EvoDiff) with design-build-test-learn cycles and data-guided prioritization to generate 76 de novo thiolation (T) domains. We built and tested 578 recombinant NRPS variants in vivo spanning minimal, full-length and hybrid assembly lines. AI-designed T-domains supported product formation across architectures, enabled catalytically active hybrids at recombined junctions and increased yields by up to [~]3-fold relative to NRPSs carrying the native T-domain. A representative design showed improved soluble expression, refolding, and a 12 {degrees}C higher melting temperature, while molecular dynamics simulations indicated preserved global stability but reshaped, state-dependent interdomain contact networks. Together, these results establish generative design as an effective route to context-conditioned optimization and reprogramming of biosynthetic assembly lines.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.6%
2
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.6%
3
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.7%
4
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
6
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Trends in Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
8
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
9
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
10
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.4%
12
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
13
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
14
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
15
Metabolic Engineering
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
18
ACS Catalysis
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
20
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
23
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
26
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%