The Contextual Specificity of Pausing: Interpreting Electromyographic Partial Responses During Action Cancellation and Attentional Capture
Weber, S.; Haugh, K.; Salomoni, S. E.; Lee, A.; Livesey, E. J.; Hinder, M. R.
Show abstract
A recent theoretical model of action stopping posits that the reactive cancellation of movement is underpinned by two dissociable processes: a rapid, involuntary "pause" that transiently suppresses motor output, and a slower, voluntary, suppression/retuning of motor output. Notably, the pause process has been posited to generalise broadly to infrequent and salient stimuli (irrespective of whether they bear an imperative to stop) and to be observable as suppression in electromyographical (EMG) recordings in the responding muscles. Over two experiments (N = 24 in each), participants completed standard stop signal and flanker tasks, and novel flanker task variants, where flanking arrows occurred infrequently (33% of trials), with or without a delay relative to the central imperative stimulus, or coincident with a stop signal. Presenting flankers infrequently specifically increased slowing to incongruent trials, with no effect on congruent or neutral trials (relative to a condition with flankers on every trial), and only after at least three preceding trials with no flanking stimuli. Critically, this was observed while carefully controlling for trial sequence effects. When flanker stimuli were presented infrequently, and after a delay, they did not reliably elicit suppression of EMG. These results highlight the contextual specificity with salient infrequent stimuli elicit behavioural slowing and EMG suppression, challenging the notion of a broadly generalisable pause process. Trial-level assessment of stopping speed using EMG revealed an effect of stimulus salience, whereby stop signals that occurred synchronously with Flanker arrows resulted in faster stopping than stop signals without Flanker arrows. Interestingly, this effect was specific to the faster end of stopping time distributions. Collectively, these results challenge interpretations which attribute electromyographic partial responses to specific neural pathways or mechanisms.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.