Back

An analytical framework for phenotypic selection of fitness-conferring genes

Sturrock, M.; Sturrock, A.

2026-03-05 systems biology
10.64898/2026.03.03.709325 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phenotypic selection can cause the transient, selective upregulation of fitness-conferring genes in isogenic cell populations under stress, producing selective enrichment of the fitness gene relative to a neutral reference gene. While computational models have shown that such enrichment requires noisy gene expression and a cellular memory linking growth rate to gene expression (Ciechonska et al., 2022), the precise mechanistic requirements and the analytical principles governing enrichment have remained unclear. Here, we present an exact analytical framework that unifies enrichment mechanisms across both growth-driven and death-driven selection regimes. By analysing a stochastic model of explicit mRNA and protein dynamics, we prove that when selection acts via cell division, the fitness advantage of faster growth is exactly cancelled by the penalty of faster protein dilution. We show this symmetry is broken by translational feedback but not by transcriptional feedback alone; for genes with regulated (switching) promoters, the promoter-state memory provides an independent route to enrichment without translational feedback. Conversely, when selection acts via cell death, this exact cancellation is bypassed, allowing selective enrichment to emerge from baseline gene expression noise without any assumptions about growth-related feedback loops or regulated vs constitutive expression. We derive an exact fluctuation-response relation demonstrating that, in all cases, enrichment scales with the super-Poissonian component of unperturbed protein noise times the relevant memory timescale. All analytical predictions are corroborated by stochastic simulations of a finitepopulation Moran model. These results have implications for the emergence of drug resistance: by transiently enriching survival-conferring phenotypes, phenotypic selection can extend the window during which cell division occurs under stress, increasing the opportunity for permanent genetic mutations to arise.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
21.9%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
14.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.7%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
7
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
9
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.6%
12
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
14
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
17
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
20
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%