Back

Nanoneedle-Enabled Quantification of rAAV9 Capsid and Genome Integrity Reveals a Truncation Hotspot Locus in a 4.5 kb Transgene

Garg, A.; Litton, E.; Raz, T.; Quan, Q.

2026-03-03 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.03.709319 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAdeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are foundational to gene therapy but remain difficult to manufacture at high quality. Vector preparations frequently contain empty capsids and truncated genomes, diminishing potency and increasing immunogenic and production burdens. Conventional assays such as qPCR and ddPCR quantify only short regions, overestimating functional genomes and failing to resolve truncation patterns. MethodsWe applied the NanoMosaic Tessie nanoneedle platform to quantify AAV9 capsid and genome titers, directly distinguishing full-length (>4 kb) and truncated genomes. A 4.5 kb CAG- Luciferase-WPRE-bGH transgene packaged in AAV9 was analyzed using (i) nanoneedle "Probe Walk" assays to map truncations, (ii) PacBio SMRT long-read sequencing for orthogonal validation, and (iii) sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (SV-AUC) to assess particle heterogeneity. ResultsProbe-walk mapping revealed asymmetric packaging with a [~]570 bp truncation hotspot 0.44-1.01 kb from the left inverted terminal repeat (ITR). PacBio sequencing confirmed positional concordance, identifying left partial reads clustering within the same region. SV-AUC resolved four major populations--empty (1.8%), partial (4.6%), full-length (70.4%), and high-molecular-weight (HMW) species (18.5%)--suggesting dimeric or multimeric capsids co-sedimenting with full-genome particles. Discussion and ConclusionsThe nanoneedle platform provided quantitative, region-specific insights into genome integrity that aligned with sequencing data while requiring minimal sample and processing time. The disproportion between molecular and AUC estimates indicates that apparent "full" species may contain long partial genomes or multimeric capsids bearing partial genomes. Together, these results establish the NanoMosaic Tessie system as a critical quality attribute (CQA) tool for assessing genome integrity and guiding process optimization. Integrating nanoneedle-based analytics early in development enables detection of truncation hotspots, improvement of vector fidelity, and acceleration of scalable, high-quality AAV manufacturing.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.3%
2
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.6%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
6
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
7
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
8
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
10
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%