Cortical and thalamic afferent connectomes distinguish ACC subregions of the macaque brain
Myers, D. C.; Love, T. M.; Fudge, J. L.
Show abstract
In human and nonhuman primates, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is an interface between the "interoceptive" and "exteroceptive" domains. The ACC contains discrete subdivisions that are distinct in cytoarchitecture and connectivity, and also serve unique functional roles. The subgenual ACC (sgACC) is a key area for arousal state modulation and processing negative emotion. Importantly, the sgACC is dysregulated in major depression and a major target for neuromodulation therapies such as deep brain stimulation. In contrast, the perigenual ACC (pgACC) is important for a host of cognitive functions, including error monitoring and social decision-making. Thus, understanding the major sources of afferent input to the sgACC and pgACC is essential for elucidating functional modulation, including in major depression and other related disorders. We took a mesoscopic connectomic approach to examine the balance of projections to sgACC and pgACC from two sources of glutamatergic input: the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and insula, and the thalamus (n=6 macaque monkeys). Using paired injections of retrograde tracers into the sgACC and pgACC and unbiased statistical clustering, we revealed that the ACC subdivisions are under the influence of vastly different cortical and thalamic drivers, i.e. heavily weighted inputs. We also found hierarchical rules (governed by cortical granularity and thalamo-cortical connectivity) by which PFC-ACC and thalamus-ACC circuits are organized. Overall, agranular PFC/insula cortices and associated thalamic nuclei are heavily weighted towards the sgACC, whereas pgACC receives a more even balance of afferents from agranular, dysgranular, and granular cortices and the thalamic nuclei with which they are associated. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe ACC contains discrete subdivisions based on cytoarchitecture and connectivity, which serve unique functional roles. The sgACC and pgACC subdivisions receive many similar inputs based on neuroimaging work. Here, we leverage higher resolution retrograde tract-tracing in macaques to examine the relative weights and relationships of multiple cortical and thalamic afferents to each region. Using unbiased analyses of labeled cells, we conclude that the balance of afferent inputs shifts from a connectome dominated by agranular cortices and their thalamic partners in sgACC, to a more balanced afferent connectome in pgACC, represented by agranular, dysgranular, and granular cortices and their broader thalamic partners. These results facilitate interpretation of functional studies, and bridge understanding of the connectional basis of psychiatric disorders.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dual medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus projecting neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus 96%
- Infralimbic prefrontal cortical projections to the autonomic brainstem: Quantification of inputs to cholinergic and adrenergic/noradrenergic nuclei 94%
- Characterization of basal forebrain glutamate neurons suggests a role in control of arousal and avoidance behavior 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Perigenual and Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Afferents Converge on Common Pyramidal Cells in Amygdala Subregions of the Macaque 94%
- Complementary Organization of Driver and Modulator Cortico-Thalamo-Cortical Circuits 93%
- Regulation of the mouse ventral tegmental area by melanin-concentrating hormone 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Calretinin and calbindin architecture of the midline thalamus associated with prefrontal-hippocampal circuitry 96%
- Dorsal and ventral mossy cells differ in their long-range axonal projections throughout the dentate gyrus of the mouse hippocampus 92%
- In Vivo Structural Connectivity of the Reward System Along the Hippocampal Long-Axis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.