Back

The tilt board task as an internally valid practice-transfer paradigm for stabilometer balance assessments

Mahdaviani, K.; Tremblay, L.; Novak, A.; Mansfield, A.

2026-03-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.03.709278 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Practice-transfer paradigms are central to motor learning research, yet dynamic balance lacks standardized, internally valid practice-transfer task pairings. This study evaluated whether a mediolateral tilt board can serve as a valid transfer task for stabilometer-based balance assessment. Sixteen healthy young adults (20-35 years) completed a single session consisting of two 40-second trials on a mediolateral stabilometer and two 40-second trials on a mediolateral tilt board. Participants aimed to keep each platform horizontal during each trial. Performance outcomes were derived from platform deviation angle. Neuromuscular outcomes were derived from surface EMG of bilateral gluteus medius, vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis, including muscle synergy structure, bilateral co-activation index, RMS amplitude of muscle activation, and strategy ratios (hip-to-knee and asymmetry metrics). Between-task associations were assessed using Spearman correlations. Cross-task muscle synergy similarity was high (mean cosine similarity = 0.915 {+/-} 0.044) and close to within-task trial-to-trial similarity, indicating preserved modular coordination across devices. Performance metrics were moderately to strongly correlated between tasks (RMS deviation angle: {rho} = 0.621, p = 0.0089; time-in-balance: {rho} = 0.668, p = 0.0036). EMG-derived strategy metrics also correlated significantly across tasks, including bilateral co-activation ({rho} = 0.688, p = 0.0023), hip-to-knee ratio ({rho} = 0.765, p = 0.0003), hip asymmetry ratio ({rho} = 0.688, p=0.0023), and knee asymmetry ratio ({rho} = 0.679, p = 0.0028). In contrast, EMG RMS amplitude did not correlate across tasks ({rho} = -0.044, p = 0.873), suggesting task-specific gain of activation magnitude. Stabilometer and tilt board tasks shared a similar coordination structure and showed a high correlation in balance performance and neuromuscular strategy, supporting the tilt board as an internally valid transfer task for stabilometer-based dynamic balance paradigms. Similarity of tasks appears strongest at the level of modular control and strategy organization, with device-specific gain scaling of activation amplitude.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.9%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.7%
4
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
17
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
26
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%