Back

Source-independent enrichment of light lanthanides: microbial mobilization, selective uptake, and intracellular storage

Gorniak, L.; Gutenthaler-Tietze, S. M.; Lobe, A.; Daumann, L.; Steudtner, R.; Schaefer, T.; Steiniger, F.; Westermann, M.; Kuesel, K.; Wegner, C.-E.

2026-03-03 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.03.709224 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Poorly soluble lanthanide minerals pose challenges for both a sustainable extraction of lanthanides as key resources for decarbonization and lanthanide-dependent microbial metabolism. Microbial use of lanthanides is widespread, yet bacterias preference for light lanthanides requires differentiation mechanisms that enable downstream utilization. Whether lanthanide discrimination occurs during access, mobilization, uptake, or intracellular processing is mostly unknown and likely controlled by habitat and bioavailability. We studied microbial lanthanide mobilization and uptake from different lanthanide minerals, an alloy, and pure lanthanide compounds. Beijerinckiaceae bacterium RH AL1 served as a model organism for an integrated approach combining transcriptomics, analytics, and electron microscopy. This facultative methylotroph depends on light lanthanides for methanol oxidation and forms periplasmic lanthanide deposits. AL1 grew with all tested lanthanide sources and selectively enriched light lanthanides independent of source type, overall lanthanide content, and the proportion of light lanthanides. Transcriptomics revealed that the type of lanthanide source significantly influenced gene expression beyond lanthanide utilization. Lanthanide discrimination in Beijerinckiaceae bacterium RH AL1 is a multilayered process rooted in the complementary action of chelation, uptake mechanisms, and periplasmic storage. Adaptations that increase lanthanide bioavailability transform mineral-bound lanthanides into shared resources within microbial communities, with implications for sustainable lanthanide use.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
8
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.9%
9
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.1%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Metallomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
24
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
26
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%