Back

Male-benefit adaptation under sex-limited selection shaped by compensatory evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.

Thyagarajan, H.; Baroody, M. G.; Sayyed, I.; Kowal, J. A.; Day, T.; Chippindale, A. K.

2026-03-04 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.03.709222 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intralocus sexual conflict (IaSC) results from opposing selection acting on traits with correlated expression between the sexes. We recently reported on a male-limited (ML) selection experiment in Drosophila melanogaster designed to investigate IaSC through a sex-limited evolution regime that theoretically resolves conflict in favour of males. However, this experiment did not universally or unambiguously improve male fitness, although female fitness declined as predicted. Here we examine sources of unintended selection: unusual genetic features of the breeding design and the special females used to enforce male-limited inheritance that may have complicated evolutionary outcomes. Specifically, we evaluate the effects of a foreign cytoplasm, genetically marked translocated autosomes, and a female-exposed Y chromosome derived from the clone-generator (CG) system, and the unique environment of sexual selection introduced by foreign CG females. We found that selected male fitness increased by 66% when expressed within the full ML genetic context, rising to over 100% when interacting with CG females. While there is no consistent fitness advantage in the "wild type" genetic background, there is a nearly significant trend of improved fitness with CG females (26% improvement). Further, outside this context, these males do not experience a fitness loss relative to controls, even showing a marginal gain of 6%. Uniformly, these gains were mediated by precopulatory traits: ML selection produced more attractive males with greater mating success and shorter mating latencies, while sperm competition remained unchanged. Intriguingly, ML-evolved males also exhibited reduced mate harm to females, contrary to the established narrative of escalating intersexual antagonism in this system. Dissecting individual components revealed significant fitness improvements associated with adaptation to the foreign cytotype (18%) and the female-exposed Y chromosome (33%), although responses varied across replicate populations. Moreover, when selected haplotypes were expressed together with the foreign cytotype in females, we observe a recovery in fitness. Together, these findings demonstrate extensive compensatory evolution to the ML selection environment, indicating that responses to the release of IaSC were shaped not only by sexually antagonistic selection but also by adaptation to the genetic manipulations and mating context inherent to the experimental design.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.3%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.3%
4
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.0%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
7
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
8
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
11
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
16
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.6%
19
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%