Back

Nutrient heterogeneity emerges from dynamical abiotic-biotic feedback in a spatially explicit plant-herbivore occupancy model

Gounand, I.; Loeuille, N.; Charberet, S.; Fronhofer, E. A.; Harvey, E.; Kefi, S.; Leroux, S. L.; Little, C. J.; McLeod, A.; Saade, C.; Massol, F.

2026-03-05 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.03.709064 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial heterogeneity of abiotic resources is essential for species coexistence. Ecological theory often assumes predefined heterogeneity of resources that constrains community dynamics, but the recent developments of meta-ecosystem ecology and zoogeochemistry highlight nutrient patterns could result from the interactions between the activities and movements of organisms and their abiotic environment. Here we investigate the mechanisms by which biotic-abiotic feedbacks could generate nutrient spatial heterogeneity in a simple plant-herbivore occupancy model where populations forage, recycle, and disperse in a homogenous landscape. By systematically varying organisms ranges of foraging and dispersal, and recycling levels, we found that limited dispersal of plants plays a key role on the emergence of nutrient patchiness by favoring small clusters of vegetation that shape their environment through consumption and recycling. However, herbivores could also create nutrient spatial heterogeneity when large foraging and dispersal ranges, and high recycling, allow them to efficiently track plant hot spots and to increase population persistence. Unexpectedly, strong aggregation of herbivore populations did not necessarily result in nutrient clustering. Rather than via recycling, herbivores mainly affected nutrient distribution indirectly, through their top-down impact on plant distribution. When evenly spread in the landscape, herbivore populations with large foraging ranges created areas of strong herbivory pressure unfavorable to plant colonization where nutrient can accumulate. These results can help understand the dynamical feedback between biota and abiotic resources. In a context where human activities alter both nutrient distribution and species abundances, a better understanding of this biotic-abiotic feedback will be key to anticipate the response of ecosystems to current perturbations.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.3%
2
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.7%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
7
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
8
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
10
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
11
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.2%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
15
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
20
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
26
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%