Back

Dietary patterns and nutritional composition of packed lunches in early years education settings

Deb, S.; Wisbey, M.; Hawkins, M.; Randall, S.; Harris, M.; Aaronricks, K.

2026-03-04 nutrition
10.64898/2026.03.03.26347536 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPacked lunches are a common feature of early childhood food provision, yet evidence describing their nutritional composition in early years settings remains limited. Understanding the foods provided during this developmental period is important, given the potential influence of early dietary exposures on later health. AimTo characterise the composition, nutritional quality, cost, and dietary patterns of packed lunches brought from home in Early Childhood Education and Care settings, and to examine variation by child age and area-level deprivation. MethodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted using a remote food photography method to assess packed lunches provided for children aged 1-4 years attending early years settings across Essex, UK. Food items were categorised into predefined groups, and nutrient composition was estimated. Area-level deprivation was determined using the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (2019). Non-parametric tests assessed between-group differences. Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to identify patterns of co-occurring foods. ResultsA total of 389 packed lunches were analysed. Starchy foods (82%), fruit (81%), dairy or alternatives (72%), and savoury snacks (74%) were commonly provided, while vegetables were less frequent and fish was rarely observed (1.5%). Overall, 97.7% of lunches contained at least one ultra-processed food (UPF), with a median of three UPF items per lunch and 74% of total energy derived from UPFs. Median energy provision was 400 kcal (IQR 309-518). Nutrient composition was broadly similar across deprivation groups, although cake and biscuit counts and UPF item counts were modestly higher in more deprived areas. The median estimated lunch cost was {pound}1.79 and did not differ by deprivation. ConclusionsPacked lunches in early years settings frequently contained ultra-processed foods and showed considerable variability in nutritional quality. Socioeconomic differences were limited, suggesting that contemporary packed lunch practices may reflect influences operating across population groups. Further research across diverse regions is warranted to better understand the provision of packed lunches and their implications for early dietary exposure.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
11
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%