Proteomics Reveal Clusters of Hypertension Cases Associated with Differing Prevalence of Cardiovascular and Renal Complications
Pehova, Y.; Apella, S.; Kolobkov, D.; Malinowski, A. R.; Pawlowski, M.; Strivens, M. A.; Sardell, J.; Gardner, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundHypertension affects over 30% of adults and is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease. It often presents without obvious symptoms, meaning that, although effective therapies exist, hypertension remains widely undiagnosed and insufficiently treated. Genomics-based prediction methods have shown only modest benefits for these disorders, but proteomic markers have demonstrated potential for greater predictive and clinical value. MethodsWe applied a novel machine-learning based patient stratification analysis pipeline to proteomics data for 7,086 hypertension patients from UK Biobanks Pharma Proteomics Project cohort (2,911 proteins). We evaluated the contribution of each protein to the output of a tree-based risk model to explore the combinations of protein expression values that naturally separate hypertension cases into clusters and assessed the prevalence of cardiovascular and renal complications within each obtained cluster. ResultsWe identified 10 clusters of hypertension patients segregated by differential expression of HAVCR1, PLAT, PTPRB, REN and RTN4R. Four of these clusters showed statistically significant enrichment for cardiovascular and renal complications, and three of them had significantly lower prevalence of complications than expected among hypertension patients. ConclusionWe hypothesize that the hypertension clusters identified may represent distinct mechanistic subtypes. With further study this could help focus studies on subgroups of hypertension patients with a shared disease etiology, identify more personalized precision medicine treatment options for each subgroup, and develop mechanism-based biomarker tests to support enriched clinical trial recruitment.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Essential hypertension is associated with changes in gut microbial metabolic pathways: A multi-site analysis of ambulatory blood pressure 93%
- UBR1 Promotes Sex-Dependent ACE2 Ubiquitination in Hypertension 93%
- Genome-Wide Interaction Analysis with DASH Diet Score Identified Novel Loci for Systolic Blood Pressure 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of urinary peptides with hypertension 94%
- Elevated blood pressure accelerates white matter brain aging among late middle-aged women: a Mendelian Randomization study in the UK Biobank 91%
- Factors Associated with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: Results of a prospective observational Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteomic Characterization of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Hospitalized with SARS-CoV2 Infection 93%
- Pervasive Influence of Hormonal Contraceptives on the Human Plasma Proteome in a Broad Population Study 92%
- Minimal Correlation but Complementary Diagnostic Utility for Plasma Cell-free RNA and Proteins 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multi-omics study of circulating phospholipid markers of blood pressure 94%
- Multimodal AI/ML for discovering novel biomarkers and predicting disease using multi-omics profiles of patients with cardiovascular diseases 93%
- Can machine learning improve risk prediction of incident hypertension? An internal method comparison and external validation of the Framingham risk model using HUNT Study data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging Dynamic Stability to Infer Regulation in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks: A Study of Infectious Vulnerability in COPD. 92%
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 92%
- New insights into the metabolomic signatures of spontaneously hypertensive rats 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.