Back

The impact of patient ethnicity on cancer incidence following platelet count and C-reactive protein tests in English primary care: a cohort study of 5 million patients

Barlow, M.; Down, L.; Mounce, L.; Merriel, S. W. D.; Watson, J.; Martins, T. O.; Bailey, S. E.

2026-03-04 primary care research
10.64898/2026.03.03.26347503 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPlatelet count and C-reactive protein (CRP) are blood tests commonly used in primary care as part of diagnostic work up for symptomatic patients. Abnormal results of these tests can indicate an undetected cancer; however, it is not known whether the association between an abnormal test result and cancer risk varies by patient ethnicity. MethodsThis cohort study used routinely collected primary and secondary health care records in England with linkage to national cancer registry data. Included patients had a record of ethnicity, no prior malignancy, a platelet count or CRP record between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2017, and were aged 40 years or over at the time of that test. Ethnicity was categorised as White, Asian, Black, Other, and Mixed. Multi-level logistic regression models estimated cancer incidence within one-year of testing, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, BMI, deprivation, and year of test. ResultsAmong 4,948,342 patients with a platelet record and 811,559 with a CRP record, one-year cancer incidence was highest among White patients and lowest among Asian patients. Following a normal platelet count, cancer incidence was 1.3% (95% CI 1.3-1.3%) for White patients and 0.63% (0.60-0.66%) for Asian patients; following thrombocytosis, incidence increased to 4.1% (4.0-4.2%) and 1.8% (1.5-2.0%), respectively. After a normal CRP result, cancer incidence was 1.5% (1.4-1.5%) for White patients and 0.79% (0.71-0.88%) for Asian patients, rising to 3.6% (3.5-3.7%) and 1.9% (1.7-2.2%) for a high CRP result, respectively. No significant interactions were found between ethnicity, blood test result, and overall cancer diagnosis, and similar diagnostic odds ratios (dOR) were observed across all ethnic groups. However, for colorectal cancer, Black patients with abnormal results showed higher diagnostic odds ratios (dOR) compared with White patients, relative to a normal result. The dOR for thrombocytosis was 11.1 (7.8-15.6) for Black patients versus 5.7 (5.4-6.0) for White patients (interaction p-value <0.001), and for raised CRP was 4.1 (2.6-6.6) for Black patients versus 2.5 (2.3-2.7) for White patients (interaction p-value=0.043). ConclusionThis large primary care study underscores the need for ethnically diverse cohorts when evaluating diagnostic tests to avoid widening healthcare inequalities.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.0%
2
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.2%
4
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
8
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
10
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
12
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
19
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%