Back

Effects of morning and evening narrowband blue light and myopic defocus on axial length in humans

Thakur, S.; Khudkhudia, H.; Sankaridurg, P.; Verkicharla, P. K.

2026-03-04 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.03.03.26347502 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo investigate the effects of morning and evening narrowband blue light exposure on axial length, and to examine the short-term effect of morning blue light combined with myopic defocus on axial length. MethodsFor objective 1, 18 individuals underwent 60 minutes of narrowband blue light exposure (460nm) in the morning (9:00-11:00AM) and evening (5:00-7:00PM) of the same day. The axial length values were normalized to the average of the morning and evening axial length values. For objective 2, 27 young adults were exposed to 60 minutes of narrowband blue light and broadband white light while wearing a +3.00 D lens over the right eye. Axial length was measured using Lenstar LS900. ResultsA significant reduction in axial length was observed after exposure to morning blue light compared to evening blue light (-10.0{+/-}3.96{micro}m vs.-0.67{+/-}3.30{micro}m; p=0.02), whereas no such effect was observed with broadband white light exposure (0.0{+/-}3.53 {micro}m vs. -2.50{+/-}4.23{micro}m, p=0.70). While the broadband white light exposure did not alter the normal diurnal variation in axial length (+2.35{+/-}1.82{micro}m vs.-6.25{+/-}2.21{micro}m, p=0.04), blue light diminished such a pattern (-4.12{+/-}1.72{micro}m vs. - 2.00{+/-}2.00{micro}m, p=0.48). The myopic defocus did not influence axial length under either narrowband blue or broadband white light conditions. ConclusionThe short-term narrowband blue light exposure led to a significant decrease in axial length in the morning than evening exposure, with a likely influence on the diurnal rhythm of axial length. Morning blue light exposure with lens-induced myopic defocus did not provide additional short-term modulation of axial length.

Published in Current Eye Research · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.