Copy Number Analysis in Congenital Nevi: Concordance and Diagnostic Limitations of aCGH, sWGS, and Methylation Profiling

BackgroundDistinguishing benign proliferative nodules (PNs) from melanoma arising within congenital melanocytic nevi remains a major diagnostic challenge. Copy number alteration (CNA) analysis is widely used to support classification, but current criteria were developed using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). The performance of alternative platforms such as shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) and methylation arrays in this setting is poorly defined. ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to compare CNA profiles obtained from aCGH, sWGS, and methylation arrays in atypical nodules arising within congenital nevi, and to correlate these molecular findings with clinical outcomes. MethodsSixteen samples from fourteen patients were retrospectively analyzed using all three platforms. CNAs were cataloged, concordance across methods was quantified using the Jaccard index, and molecular classifications were compared. Clinical follow-up was reviewed to provide clinical context. ResultsaCGH detected 39 CNAs, sWGS 60, and methylation profiling 66. Concordance was highest between sWGS and methylation (mean Jaccard 0.67), followed by aCGH versus sWGS (0.64) and aCGH versus methylation (0.49). Cases with high aneuploidy demonstrated strong cross-platform agreement, whereas low-burden lesions exhibited greater variability between methods. Divergent molecular classifications were observed in six cases. ConclusionsWhile all methods reliably detect broad chromosomal changes, sWGS and methylation arrays identify many additional focal CNAs that may not align with CGH-based diagnostic criteria. Until platform-specific thresholds are established, aCGH remains the most conservative and clinically validated approach for evaluating proliferative nodules in congenital nevi. SIGNIFICANCEAccurate molecular classification of melanocytic proliferations in congenital nevi is essential but challenging, particularly in patients with multiple proliferative nodules. This study provides the first systematic comparison of aCGH, sWGS, and methylation-based CNA profiling in this setting. We show that higher-resolution platforms detect substantially more focal aberrations, which can lead to discordant and potentially overcalled malignancy assessments when applying CGH-derived criteria. Our findings highlight the need for platform-adapted diagnostic frameworks and support continued use of CGH as the most conservative and clinically validated method for risk stratification. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=118 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26347388v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (27K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d7b155org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bb7081org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d72e3forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11d3f0b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG