Back

Determinants of General Practitioners Initiation of Conversations about Childhood Overweight: A mixed-methods study

Delhez, C. C. A.; Adriaanse, M. A.; Vos, H. M. M.; Vos, R. C.; van der Kleij, R.

2026-03-09 primary care research
10.64898/2026.03.03.26347173 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChildhood overweight is a major health concern with long-term consequences. Dutch guidelines recommend that general practitioners (GPs) screen for overweight in children regardless of visit reason, yet GPs infrequently initiate weight-related conversations. ObjectivesTo explore what determines GPs initiation of conversations about childhood overweight, identify the determinants with the highest potential for change, and examine how, in particular, emotional responses and equanimity, relate to GPs intention to initiate conversations. MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among Dutch GPs (in training) between March-May 2025. Behavioural determinants, based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, emotional responses, equanimity, and anticipated behaviour and implementation success were assessed. For all determinants, room for improvement (deviation from maximum), relevance (correlation with anticipated behaviour), and the potential for change (combining these two) were calculated using R. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis. Results57 GPs completed the survey. Most reported adequate skills (66%), knowledge (61%), and motivation (74%); yet only 25% reported high implementation success. Their behaviour is constrained by a lack of habituation, negative outcome expectancies, failing to remember to act, and a lack of social and organizational support. Emotional responses were evident, with 10-15% of respondents reporting high arousal or clearly positive or negative valence. Valence, but not arousal or equanimity, was positively associated with anticipated intention (r = 0.45, p < 0.001). ConclusionSupporting routine weight-related conversations requires strategies to strengthen habit formation, reshape outcome expectancies, support memory, address social and organizational factors, and further explore GPs emotion regulation. Key messagesO_LIAlthough highly motivated, general practitioners infrequently initiate conversations about childhood overweight due to existing practical barriers and barriers related to internal processes. C_LIO_LIHabit formation showed the greatest potential for change, emphasizing the importance of automaticity in initiating conversations. C_LIO_LIRegulation of emotions and outcome expectancies, may support GPs in consistently initiating sensitive weight-related conversations. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.4%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.1%
4
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
7
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%