Back

Global O-GlcNAcome Identifies O-GlcNAcylated Proteins Regulating Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells Differentiation

Jiang, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, P.; Ye, K.; Song, Y.; Zhang, M.

2026-03-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.02.709210 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) differentiate into myelinating oligodendrocytes to form the myelin sheaths essential for neural function, a process frequently compromised during aging and in diseases like multiple sclerosis. However, the regulatory landscape of myelination remains incompletely understood. Here, we perform a comprehensive proteomic analysis of the O-GlcNAcome in postnatal day 0 mouse OPCs, identifying 165 O-GlcNAcylation sites across 118 proteins. These proteins are mostly nuclear and characterized by single-site modifications. Comparative analysis identifies 74 novel sites and 22 proteins uniquely O-GlcNAcylated in OPCs. Molecular docking suggestes that O-GlcNAcylation might act as a dynamic regulator of OPC differentiation. Notably, global O-GlcNAcylation levels increase during the OPC-to-oligodendrocyte transition. By integrating our findings with multiple sclerosis-related transcriptomic and proteomic datasets, we identify candidate proteins linking O-GlcNAc dysregulation to demyelination. Among these, Vimentin (Vim) exhibits a pronounced age-dependent discrepancy between decreased protein levels and elevated mRNA expression during differentiation. We validate Threonine 35 and 63 as key O-GlcNAcylation sites on Vimentin. Functional assays confirm that blocking Vimentin O-GlcNAcylation enhance the OPC differentiation. Collectively, our study establishes the first O-GlcNAc landscape for OPCs and suggests O-GlcNAcylation as a pivotal regulator for OPC differentiation.

Published in Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.