Back

Hormone signaling and immune programs define differential endocrine responsiveness in high-risk breast tissue

Goldhammer, N.; Bont, M.; Warhadpande, S.; Choi, M.; Cedano, J.; Greenwood, H.; Ye, J.; Schwartz, C.; Alvarado, M.; Ewing, C.; Goodwin, K.; Mukhtar, R.; Wong, J.; Abe, S.; Chandler, J.; Jackson, J.; Olopade, O.; Campbell, M.; Lam, A.; Park, C.; Vertido, A.; van 't Veer, L.; Hylton, N.; Esserman, L.; Rosenbluth, J.

2026-03-04 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.02.709108 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hormone therapies are frequently used to reduce breast cancer risk in individuals at increased risk for primary or subsequent disease; however, tissue-level responses to these therapies are heterogeneous and incompletely understood. Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a non-invasive radiologic readout of breast tissue features associated with endocrine responsiveness and cancer risk. Although BPE is associated with hormonal exposure, a subset of patients with BPE do not show a response to preventive endocrine therapy and therefore may remain at increased breast cancer risk. In this study, we integrated single-nucleus RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics to define the determinants of endocrine responsiveness in the setting of BPE. We identify hormone-driven epithelial cells with high levels of estrogen signaling and endocrine responsiveness, together with immune-associated epithelial programs characterized by diminished luminal identity and increased expression of immune-modulatory pathways, including major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II and CD74. Functional organoid assays validate that these epithelial states exhibit differential sensitivity to tamoxifen and demonstrate that inflammatory signals can induce immune-modulatory epithelial programs. Together, our findings identify hormone signaling and immune programs as key determinants of endocrine responsiveness in breast tissue and provide a biological basis for interpreting radiologic markers relevant to cancer prevention.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
2
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.5%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.2%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.2%
9
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
10
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.8%
12
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
15
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
17
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
21
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
24
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
25
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
27
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%