Back

A multibrain advantage for cooperative human behaviour

Moerel, D.; Grootswagers, T.; Quek, G. L.; Varlet, M.

2026-03-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.02.708977 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Collaboration is a cornerstone of human behaviour, enabling individuals to achieve complex goals that transcend individual capabilities. While previous research has largely focused on the alignment of neural representations across brains during social interactions, real-world cooperation frequently involves complementary roles, where success depends on integrating distinct yet interdependent representations. Here, we combined electroencephalography (EEG) hyperscanning and multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) methods to investigate neural representations in pairs of participants as they jointly performed a speeded two-dimensional visual matching task with asymmetric controls to encourage task division (i.e., attending to different stimulus features). Our results provide direct neural evidence of the emergence of selective information encoding within individual brains and complementary information encoding across brains during successful cooperation. Specifically, optimally divided task dimensions give rise to a late (> 485 ms) multibrain advantage, wherein the combined neural signals of the two participants carry more target-related information than that of either brain individually. Notably, the magnitude of these information-processing modulations within and across brains robustly predicted pairs collective task performance. These findings have broader implications for future research on collaboration, highlighting the need to move beyond representational alignment to harness diverse human as well as machine capabilities across our societies to unlock collective potential.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.