Back

Abiotic Factors and Competitive Exclusion Drive Assembly Patterns in Two Insular Gecko Adaptive Radiations Displaying Ecomorphological Convergence

Skipwith, P. L.; Castillo-Rodriguez, N.; Zenil-Ferguson, R.

2026-03-04 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.02.702884 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adaptive radiation theory posits that speciation in such lineages is largely driven by ecological opportunity in concurrent morphological expansion in response to niche availability. Here, we use a phylogenomic estimate of Australasian diplodactyloid geckos in combination with meristic and ecological data to infer patterns of ecological diversification, quantify signatures of stabilizing selection, and the factors driving speciation processes. Specifically, we focus on two relatively young but speciose and ecomorphologically diverse assemblages from the ancient islands of New Caledonia and New Zealand. Models accounting for stabilizing selection recover shifts in morphospace along many branches that also experienced shifts in ecological guild as inferred from ancestral state reconstructions. We find convergent evolution to be present between the two insular lineages as they independently transitioned to similar guilds from different ancestral ecologies. Community assembly is integral to understanding the dynamics of adaptive radiations and various studies focused on identifying if biotic or abiotic factors drive character suits and sympatry in diverse lineages. Bayesian and multiple regression analyses suggest that abiotic factors rather than interspecific competition dictates phenotypic divergence in both insular lineages. Rather, species seem to diverge phenotypically in allopatry and environmental factors, such as climate, in combination with competitive exclusion drive phenotypic overlap in sympatry. This study provides the first modern assessment of convergence for diplodactyloid geckos and provides robust evidence indicating that similar selective pressures have shaped morphological diversity in these disparate as well the factors affecting sympatry.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.1%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
6
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.1%
7
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
9
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.0%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.3%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
14
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
20
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%