Back

Potassium-competitive acid channel blockers versus Proton-Pump inhibitors in the prevention of post-endoscopic peptic ulcer rebleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tazinkeng, N. N.; FORBES, S.; MCGOWAN, R.; AGUDELO, M.; MAPOUKA, M.; NWATAMOLE, B.; BOATENG, S.; MERIKI, C.-B.; MOHANTY, S.

2026-03-06 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.03.02.26346403 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionVonoprazan, a new oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB), has shown promise in terms of superior acid suppression when compared to Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). We evaluated the efficacy of PCABs versus PPIs in preventing rebleeding in high-risk peptic ulcer patients after endoscopic hemostasis. MethodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search for relevant studies across Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov, from inception till March 25, 2025. The primary outcome of interest was peptic ulcer rebleeding rate. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. ResultsThree studies with 54,410 patients receiving endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding were included in our analysis. The mean age of included participants was 71 {+/-} 1.83 years. There was no significant difference in rebleeding rates between patients receiving PPIs and PCABs (RR 0.827; 95 % CI: 0.5 -1.3). We observed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay in the PCAB group when compared to the PPI group (MD: -0.44, 95% CI: -0.72 - -0.17), but no significant difference in all-cause mortality between both groups (RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.79 - 1.04). ConclusionsOur study demonstrates comparable efficacy of PPIs and PCABs in preventing rebleeding in patients with high-risk peptic ulcers after successful endoscopic hemostasis. However, there was a significant reduction in hospital length of stay favoring PCABs. Research in ContextO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSBleeding from peptic ulcers is considered one of the major reasons for mortality and hospitalization, and the standard treatment after endoscopic hemostasis is the administration of high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Potassium competitive acid blockers (PCABs), such as vonoprazan, have been reported to have more potent and faster onset of action than PPIs in the treatment of acid-related diseases, but their efficacy in the prevention of post-endoscopic peptic ulcer rebleeding has not been well established in the literature in the form of a dedicated meta-analysis. What this study addsIn the present study, the efficacy and safety of PCABs in the prevention of post-endoscopic rebleeding and mortality in 54,410 patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding were investigated in the context of a systematic review and meta-analysis. PCABs were found to have similar efficacy to PPIs in the prevention of mortality and rebleeding in the context of endoscopic hemostasis, and the use of PCABs was also observed to reduce the length of stay in the hospital to a significant extent. How this study might affect research, practice or policyThese findings indicate that PCABs are a reasonable alternative to PPIs in post-endoscopic management of high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding and may be particularly useful in situations where early discharge and optimization of resources are critical. Additional large-scale studies in different populations are required to validate these findings and create guidelines

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.1%
4
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
5
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
8
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
11
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
13
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
14
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
16
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
18
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
19
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
20
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%