Back

Metabolic trade-offs in sugar beet under drought and beet leaf miner infestation: implications for herbivore success

Rahman, S.; Surovy, M. Z.; Vosteen, I.; Rostas, M.

2026-03-03 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.01.708914 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Increasing frequency of drought under climate change threatens crop production and intensifies pest pressures, yet the interactive effects of drought and herbivory on plant metabolism and ecological outcomes remain incompletely understood. We subjected sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) plants to moderate and high drought, alone or with infestation by the beet leaf miner (Pegomya cunicularia), and analyzed plant physiology, central metabolites, and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. Drought alone reduced growth and photosynthetic efficiency, while combined stress led to accentuated metabolic reprogramming, including increased amino acids and organic acids, and a concurrent suppression and alteration of VOC emissions, especially in plants affected by high drought and leaf mining. The resulting changes in VOC blends reduced plant attractiveness to ovipositing females, leading to fewer eggs laid on severely stressed plants. Contrastingly, moderate drought generated a nutrient-rich environment: larvae feeding on these plants exhibited the highest growth rates, larger pupae and adults, and increased feeding damage. High drought strongly limited both plant water content and larval development. These findings reveal a stress-dependent tradeoff between enhanced leaf nutritional quality and reduced host detectability, underscoring the importance of integrating multi-stress plant biology for future pest management and crop resilience. HighlightCombined drought and herbivory in sugar beet plant triggered stress-intensity-dependent trade-offs between leaf nutritional quality and volatile emissions, affecting beet leaf miner performance and oviposition--highlighting how multi-stress interactions shape plant-insect dynamics. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/708914v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d92105org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@70693org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@140dc82org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14cf411_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Graphical Abstract C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.3%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.1%
3
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.1%
4
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.3%
7
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.7%
11
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
14
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
17
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
21
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
24
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
26
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
28
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
30
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%