Multiscale confidence quantification for virtual spatial transcriptomics with UTOPIA
Jin, K.; Chen, Z.; Yu, X.; Yuan, M.; Schroeder, A.; Dumoulin, B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Park, J. H.; Hwang, T. H.; Susztak, K.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, N.; Li, M.
Show abstract
Virtual spatial transcriptomics (ST) methods predict gene expression or cell types from histology images, extending molecular readouts beyond the limited regions or samples directly measured by ST platforms. However, the statistical reliability of these predictions remains unclear. Here, we present UTOPIA, a model-agnostic framework for multiscale confidence quantification in virtual ST. UTOPIA assigns statistically calibrated confidence scores to predictions across spatial resolutions and biological granularities, ranging from single genes to metagenes and from specific cell types to broader cell classes. UTOPIA controls false discovery rates for detecting genes, metagenes, or cell types while accounting for local tissue context. We show that prediction confidence depends critically on both spatial resolution and biological granularity, with reliable inference often emerging only at coarser, biologically meaningful scales. Across multiple ST platforms and in both in-sample and out-of-sample settings, UTOPIA enhances interpretability, prevents false biological conclusions, and enables more trustworthy downstream analyses of virtual ST.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-cell segmentation of tissue images with human-level performance using large-scale data annotation and deep learning 98%
- Spatial charting of single cell transcriptomes in tissues 97%
- BayesSpace enables the robust characterization of spatial gene expression architecture in tissue sections at increased resolution 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.