Back

Evaluating Few-Shot Meta-Learning using STUNT for Microbiome-Based Disease Classification

Peng, C.; Abeel, T.

2026-03-03 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.01.708821 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The human gut microbiome is increasingly explored as a diagnostic indicator for disease, yet machine learning models trained on metagenomic data are often constrained by limited sample sizes and poor cross-cohort generalizability. Meta-learning, a machine learning paradigm that optimizes models for rapid adaptation to new tasks with limited examples, offers a promising strategy to address this by leveraging the potential shared microbial structure across publicly available metagenomic datasets. Here, we evaluated STUNT, a framework combining self-supervised pretraining with metric-based meta-learning (Prototypical Networks), for few-shot microbiome-based disease classification. Using over 5,000 species-level gut metagenomic profiles from 57 cohorts in GMrepo v2, we meta-trained STUNT on 52 cohorts and evaluated the pretrained embedding on five held-out disease cohorts covering rheumatoid arthritis (RA), gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy (GDM), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), diabetes mellitus, type 1 (T1D), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We compared Prototypical Networks, Logistic Regression, and Random Forest with and without STUNT-derived embeddings across shot sizes of 1 to 10 samples per class. We found that STUNT-derived embeddings provided a modest benefit only under extreme data scarcity (one labeled sample per class) and this advantage rapidly diminished and reversed with additional samples, indicating that the meta-learned representations impose an information bottleneck limiting access to task-specific signals. Classification performance varied substantially across cohorts, consistent with PERMANOVA-estimated microbiome-disease separability. These results highlight the need for representation learning approaches that preserve disease- and cohort-specific variation and suggest that intrinsic biological signal strength is the primary determinant of classification success.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.