Evaluating Few-Shot Meta-Learning using STUNT for Microbiome-Based Disease Classification
Peng, C.; Abeel, T.
Show abstract
The human gut microbiome is increasingly explored as a diagnostic indicator for disease, yet machine learning models trained on metagenomic data are often constrained by limited sample sizes and poor cross-cohort generalizability. Meta-learning, a machine learning paradigm that optimizes models for rapid adaptation to new tasks with limited examples, offers a promising strategy to address this by leveraging the potential shared microbial structure across publicly available metagenomic datasets. Here, we evaluated STUNT, a framework combining self-supervised pretraining with metric-based meta-learning (Prototypical Networks), for few-shot microbiome-based disease classification. Using over 5,000 species-level gut metagenomic profiles from 57 cohorts in GMrepo v2, we meta-trained STUNT on 52 cohorts and evaluated the pretrained embedding on five held-out disease cohorts covering rheumatoid arthritis (RA), gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy (GDM), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), diabetes mellitus, type 1 (T1D), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We compared Prototypical Networks, Logistic Regression, and Random Forest with and without STUNT-derived embeddings across shot sizes of 1 to 10 samples per class. We found that STUNT-derived embeddings provided a modest benefit only under extreme data scarcity (one labeled sample per class) and this advantage rapidly diminished and reversed with additional samples, indicating that the meta-learned representations impose an information bottleneck limiting access to task-specific signals. Classification performance varied substantially across cohorts, consistent with PERMANOVA-estimated microbiome-disease separability. These results highlight the need for representation learning approaches that preserve disease- and cohort-specific variation and suggest that intrinsic biological signal strength is the primary determinant of classification success.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking Differential Abundance Analysis Methods for Correlated Microbiome Sequencing Data 95%
- An in-depth comparison of linear and non-linear joint embedding methods for bulk and single-cell multi-omics 94%
- Novel multi-omics deconfounding variational autoencoders can obtain meaningful disease subtyping 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.