Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agents-Enabled Dissection of RTK-RAS and MAPK Pathway Dependencies in Gemcitabine-Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Diaz, F. C.; Waldrup, B.; Carranza, F. G.; Manjarrez, S.; Velazquez-Villarreal, E.
Show abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by profound molecular heterogeneity and inconsistent responses to gemcitabine-based therapy. Although KRAS mutations are nearly ubiquitous, the broader RTK-RAS and MAPK signaling networks, and their association with therapeutic response, remain insufficiently characterized. We performed an integrative clinical-genomic study of 184 PDAC tumors, stratified by age at diagnosis and gemcitabine exposure, systematically evaluating somatic alterations within curated RTK-RAS/MAPK gene panels. Conversational artificial intelligence agents (AI-HOPE-RTK-RAS and AI-HOPE-MAPK) were deployed to dynamically construct cohorts and conduct pathway-level analyses, with results subsequently confirmed using conventional statistical approaches. Among late-onset PDAC cases, ERBB2 and RET mutations were significantly enriched in gemcitabine-treated tumors. In early-onset disease, CACNA2D family alterations were more common in untreated tumors, whereas FLNB and TP53 mutations were observed at higher frequencies in treated cases. Notably, late-onset patients who did not receive gemcitabine and lacked RTK-RAS or MAPK pathway alterations demonstrated significantly improved overall survival. These findings identify age- and treatment-specific signaling dependencies extending beyond canonical KRAS alterations and reinforce a precision oncology framework in PDAC. Conversational AI enabled rapid, multidimensional integration of clinical and genomic data, facilitating the identification of clinically meaningful pathway architectures.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase 1b dose expansion and translational analyses of olaparib in combination with the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib in recurrent endometrial, triple negative breast, and ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 93%
- RRAS and RRAS2 mutations are recurrent oncogenic drivers in lung cancer and are sensitive to the pan-RAS inhibitor RMC-6236 93%
- Myeloid cell-associated resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in urothelial cancer revealed through bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acquired RAD51C promoter methylation loss causes PARP inhibitor resistance in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma 93%
- Biomarker-guided treatment strategies for ovarian cancer identified from a heterogeneous panel of patient-derived tumor xenografts 92%
- Pharmacologically targeting KRASG12D in PDAC models:tumor cell intrinsic and extrinsic impact 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bypassing cisplatin resistance in Nrf2 hyperactivated head and neck cancer through effective PI3Kinase targeting 93%
- Non-B DNA-Informed Mutation Burden as a Marker of Treatment Response and Outcome in Cancer 92%
- Sequential ATR and PARP Inhibition Overcomes Acquired DNA Damaging Agent Resistance in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic and transcriptomic determinants of therapy resistance and immune landscape evolution during anti-EGFR treatment in colorectal cancer 93%
- Coexisting morpho-biotypes unveil the regulatory bases of phenotypic plasticity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 92%
- Evolutionary states and trajectories characterized by distinct pathways stratify ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Convergence for Inactivation of TGFβ Signaling Is a Common Feature of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer 94%
- The genomic landscape of intrinsic and acquired resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer 93%
- Evolutionary Origins of Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.