Back

Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agents-Enabled Dissection of RTK-RAS and MAPK Pathway Dependencies in Gemcitabine-Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

Diaz, F. C.; Waldrup, B.; Carranza, F. G.; Manjarrez, S.; Velazquez-Villarreal, E.

2026-03-03 oncology
10.64898/2026.03.01.26347364 medRxiv
Show abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by profound molecular heterogeneity and inconsistent responses to gemcitabine-based therapy. Although KRAS mutations are nearly ubiquitous, the broader RTK-RAS and MAPK signaling networks, and their association with therapeutic response, remain insufficiently characterized. We performed an integrative clinical-genomic study of 184 PDAC tumors, stratified by age at diagnosis and gemcitabine exposure, systematically evaluating somatic alterations within curated RTK-RAS/MAPK gene panels. Conversational artificial intelligence agents (AI-HOPE-RTK-RAS and AI-HOPE-MAPK) were deployed to dynamically construct cohorts and conduct pathway-level analyses, with results subsequently confirmed using conventional statistical approaches. Among late-onset PDAC cases, ERBB2 and RET mutations were significantly enriched in gemcitabine-treated tumors. In early-onset disease, CACNA2D family alterations were more common in untreated tumors, whereas FLNB and TP53 mutations were observed at higher frequencies in treated cases. Notably, late-onset patients who did not receive gemcitabine and lacked RTK-RAS or MAPK pathway alterations demonstrated significantly improved overall survival. These findings identify age- and treatment-specific signaling dependencies extending beyond canonical KRAS alterations and reinforce a precision oncology framework in PDAC. Conversational AI enabled rapid, multidimensional integration of clinical and genomic data, facilitating the identification of clinically meaningful pathway architectures.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.