Back

Mathematical diabetes disease progression modeling in the integrated glucose-insulin model among individuals with impaired glucose tolerance from the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study

Ghadzi, S. M. S.; Karlsson, M. O.; de Mello, V.; Uusitupa, M.; Kjellsson, M. C.

2026-03-03 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.02.28.708712 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The integrated glucose-insulin (IGI) model describes glucose and insulin after glucose administration in healthy individuals and patients with type 2 diabetes. The model, however, does not include disease progression (DP) from prediabetes to overt diabetes, which is driven by decreased insulin sensitivity and relative beta-cell failure. The objective of this study was to develop the IGI model to include the DP model for glucose and insulin in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), with and without lifestyle intervention. Data of frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were obtained from a sub study of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (FDPS) in 101 individuals with IGT, randomly assigned to control and lifestyle intervention groups. A combination of intravenous and oral IGI model was used to fit the baseline until the fourth-year data using NONMEM, with prior information. The first-phase insulin secretion (FPS) and insulin-dependent glucose clearance (CLGI) decreased by 3.0% year and 8.1%/year, due to DP. Baseline insulin concentration (ISS) was increased by 68% from baseline to Year 1, and remained unchanged thereafter. With intervention, a net reduction of 0.1%/year for FPS and reduction of 2.1%/year for CLGI was quantified, translated to a much slower deterioration of the first-phase insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity. The ISS was affected by a net increase of 153% from baseline to Year 1 and remained constant after that, possibly reflecting beta-cell function improvement. The DP was successfully included in the IGI model to describe differences in IGT population, with and without lifestyle intervention.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
19.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.8%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
8
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
17
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
19
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
27
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%