Back

Cross-species meta-analysis reveals determinants of homing gene drive performance

Verkuijl, S. A. N.; Ivimey-Cook, E. R.; Liu, B.; Bonsall, M. B.; Leftwich, P. T.; Windbichler, N.

2026-03-03 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.02.28.708699 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Homing gene drives can bias their inheritance above Mendelian expectations, but reported outcomes vary widely. We compiled a cross-species dataset of nearly one million scored progeny from 42 publications reporting CRISPR/Cas9 endonuclease-based gene drives in 10 model, pest, and vector species. Using multilevel meta-analytic models, we evaluate biological, cross, and transgene design factors as predictors of biased drive inheritance. Species is the strongest predictor, but most heterogeneity remains unexplained; design features each explain a modest fraction of the remaining variation, with large construct-to-construct differences pointing to the full combination of design choices rather than any single factor. Nuclease expression timing, the most common optimization target, has limited predictive value after accounting for correlated factors, and predictions do not transfer well between species. Maternal nuclease deposition has a marginal effect on drive inheritance but dramatically increases somatic phenotype rates in offspring, revealing a tissue-of-action rather than repair-outcome effect. An interactive web tool enables community analysis of this dataset, which will guide the design of more efficient gene drives for genetic vector control, invasive species management and other applications. https://sverkuijl.shinyapps.io/GeneDrive/

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.1%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 5%
19.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.8%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
6
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
7
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
10
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
11
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
12
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
13
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
16
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
19
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
20
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.5%
21
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%