Back

Abolishing respiratory complex I decreases in vivo growth of high grade serous ovarian cancer cells and sensitizes to anti-angiogenic therapy

Kurelac, I.; Cavina, B.; Nanetti, F.; Corra, S.; Sollazzo, M.; Coada, C. A.; Grillini, M.; Scalambra, L.; Lama, E.; Angi, E.; Minuzzo, S.; Iommarini, L.; Indraccolo, S.; Porcelli, A. M.; Gasparre, G.

2026-03-03 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.28.708681 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeting mitochondrial Complex I (CI) is a currently emerging anti-cancer strategy, with several enzyme inhibitors entering clinical trials. Among others, aggressive high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSOC) may particularly benefit from this therapeutic approach due to the scarce response to first- and second-line treatments, with consequent high mortality, such as the anti-angiogenic bevacizumab. We here show that CI represents a vulnerability in HGSOC, which can be exploited for therapeutic intervention. Indeed, ablating CI function in OV-90 HGSOC cells led to significant in vivo tumor growth decrease, smaller masses, and lower KI-67 proliferative index. This was confirmed in a switch-off system in which CI deprivation was induced during tumor progression to mimic pharmacologic treatment, suggesting this result can be achieved in growing neoplasms. We also show that abolishing CI in HGSOC cells leads to failure in stabilizing the hypoxia inducible factor-1a and to respond to hypoxia through the transcriptional activation of its target genes, ultimately lowering vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and generating an immature intratumor vascular system accompanied by a decreased blood flow. Last, we demonstrate that targeting CI sets the biological basis for increased sensitivity to anti-angiogenics, as CI-deprived tumors displayed growth arrest when bevacizumab was administered, unlike their CI-competent counterpart. Our findings point to CI inhibition as a booster for anti-VEGF therapies and pave the way for combined protocols in treatment of HGSOC.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 5%
8.2%
3
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
8.0%
5
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.7%
7
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
10
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.0%
15
Cell Death & Differentiation
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
21
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
23
Science Signaling
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%