Back

An optogenetics-compatible red fluorescent calcium indicator with negligible blue light photoactivation

Zhang, X.; Addison, B. R.; Ulutas, E. Z.; Deng, C. M.; Doshi, S.; Nabhan, S.; Emanuel, A. J.; Markowitz, J. E.; Koveal, D.

2026-03-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.28.708321 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Red genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) are important tools for live cell and in vivo imaging. However, their application in optogenetic experiments has been limited by their complex photophysics, which can yield blue-light-induced artifacts. These photophysical drawbacks arise from the fluorescent protein (FP) used to construct the GECI. To address these limitations, we engineered novel red GECIs based on photostable red FPs, including mScarlet variants. After testing multiple design topologies and screening for calcium responses, we identified a lead variant, named ScaRCaMP-1.0. ScaRCaMP-1.0 exhibits moderate Ca2+ responses ({Delta}F/F0 = -13%) relative to other red GECIs, a tradeoff that appears to have enabled remarkable blue-light photostability at power densities exceeding 200 mW/mm2. We validated the performance of ScaRCaMP-1.0 in an optogenetic regime, and in vivo via fiber photometry. Finally, guided by structural predictions, we investigated the mechanism underlying ScaRCaMP responses. A pair of lysine residues on the surface of the FP appear to be important for controlling Ca2+ responses, and mutation of one residue (K132Y) notably increased the response size ({Delta}F/F0 = -22%) without compromising blue-light photostability. We call the improved variant ScaRCaMP-2.0. Taken together, these results establish ScaRCaMP as an optogenetics-compatible red GECI and demonstrate the potential of mScarlet-based fluorophores as a basis for generating photostable red biosensors.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 13%
12.6%
2
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
5
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
7
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
11
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
12
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
19
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%