Back

Thoracic spine mobilization on autonomic nervous system in a healthy population - a randomized controlled double-blinded feasibility study

Rogan, S.; Farrell, G.; Schlarb, S.; Schlarb, M.; Agarwal, S.; Clijsen, R.

2026-03-03 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.02.28.26347312 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThoracic spine mobilization (TSM) has been proposed to influence autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity, yet evidence remains inconsistent and feasibility of standardised protocols is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether a randomized TSM protocol can be implemented successfully in healthy participants and to provide preliminary estimates of its effects on heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate (HR). MethodsA randomized feasibility trial was conducted with healthy young adults receiving six manual therapy sessions consisting of rotational mobilizations above Th5 over 14 days. Feasibility outcomes included adherence, absence of unexpected adverse events (UAE), and practicality of autonomic data acquisition. Physiological outcomes comprised HRV parameters, high-frequency (HF), low-frequency/high-frequency ratio (LF/HF) and HR, analyzed using autoregressive (AR) and fast Fourier transform (FFT) methods. ResultsProcedural safety and methodological integrity were confirmed (no UAE; complete datasets), but feasibility was only partially achieved due to adherence shortfalls, higher attrition, and device-related delays. Physiologically, large effect sizes were observed in the intervention group: at evening assessment, HF_AR showed ES = 0.80 (p = .008); at morning assessment, HF_FFT ES = 0.72 (p = .016), HF_AR ES = 0.78 (p = .010), and LF/HF_AR ES = 0.70 (p = .021). HR remained unchanged. These findings suggest repeated TSM may modulate HRV, primarily through HF-related changes associated with vagal activity, while LF/HF interpretation remains controversial. ConclusionA randomized TSM protocol is safe and methodologically viable with logistical refinements. Preliminary evidence indicates potential vagal modulation, warranting larger trials with respiratory control, ECG-based HRV, multimodal ANS measures, and clinical populations to confirm efficacy and translational relevance.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
3
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
5
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
10
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
24
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%