Back

Systematic computational fluid dynamic analysis of intra-aneurysmal blood flow using data-driven synthetic cerebral aneurysm geometries

Yamamoto, Y.; Ueda, K.; Wakimura, H.; Yamada, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Kawano, H.; Ii, S.

2026-03-02 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.28.26347304 medRxiv
Show abstract

The present study presents a systematic approach for generating data-driven synthetic cerebral aneurysm geometries and evaluating their hemodynamics through computational fluid dynamics. Seven patient-specific aneurysm geometries from the right internal carotid artery were reconstructed from time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography images and standardized through orientation alignment, followed by non-rigid registration onto a common spherical point cloud as a template. Principal component analysis (PCA) was then applied to the aligned point-cloud data to quantify morphological variability and parameterize shape deformation. The first four principal components captured over 90% of the total variance; however, higher-order components were required to capture the detailed geometrical features of the original geometries. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed on the PCA-based synthetic geometries under pulsatile flow conditions to investigate the influence of shape variations on intra-aneurysmal flow patterns, time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), and oscillatory shear index (OSI). The first principal component score (PCS1), which was associated with changes in aneurysm height and dome width, had the strongest effects on TAWSS and OSI levels. Lower PCS1 values, which corresponded to taller and more oblique domes, produced slower adjacent flow and elevated OSI, whereas higher PCS1 values increased TAWSS. The second principal component score primarily modulated lateral geometric asymmetry and further influenced OSI distribution for the lower PCS1 values. Collectively, these findings indicate that PCA-based shape parameterization provides a practical approach for generating synthetic aneurysm datasets and systematically assessing how specific morphological features govern hemodynamic behavior. The proposed approach is expected to contribute to the future development of surrogate modeling and data-driven hemodynamic prediction.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
4
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
10
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
11
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
12
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
13
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
15
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
16
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
17
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%