Back

Temporal dynamics of radiotherapy and chemotherapy response in lower-grade gliomas using causal machine learning

Yang, E.; Agrawal, S.; Kinslow, C. J.; Cheng, S. K.; Yang, L.; Wang, E.; Wang, T. J.; Kachnic, L. A.; Brenner, D. J.; Shuryak, I.

2026-03-02 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.28.26347288 medRxiv
Show abstract

Lower-grade gliomas (World Health Organization [WHO] grades 2-3) exhibit variable treatment responses, yet clinical decisions remain guided by population-level trial results. Standard causal survival forests estimate treatment effects at individual time horizons but lack methodology to synthesize these into interpretable temporal trajectories. Here, we apply the Causal Analysis of Survival Trajectories (CAST) framework, a recently developed extension of causal survival forests that synthesizes horizon-specific causal effect estimates into smooth temporal curves while accounting for between-horizon covariances via bootstrap estimation and Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage. We apply CAST to estimate time-varying, heterogeneous effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in 776 patients with lower-grade gliomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; n=512) and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA; n=264), analyzing six treatment-outcome scenarios and adjusting for age, sex, WHO grade, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status, 1p/19q codeletion, and extent of resection using elastic net propensity scores with overlap weighting. CAST curves reveal that chemotherapy provides consistent, sustained benefits across both cohorts; survival probability gains peak at 0.31 at 72-84 months for TCGA overall survival and 0.46 at 48 months for progression-free survival, with restricted mean survival time gains of 18.4 and 32.5 months at 10 years, respectively. CGGA chemotherapy shows delayed but large positive effects (survival probability peak 0.48 at 108 months). Radiotherapy effects are mixed, with modest E-values indicating sensitivity to residual confounding by indication. Subgroup CAST curves identify age at diagnosis as the dominant driver of treatment effect heterogeneity (46-56% of splits). All findings are robust to placebo permutation, simulated unobserved confounder, and negative control refutation tests. The CAST framework provides a general-purpose tool for temporal treatment effect visualization applicable beyond neuro-oncology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 11%
14.4%
3
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
4
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
11
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
16
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
26
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
29
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%