Temporal dynamics of radiotherapy and chemotherapy response in lower-grade gliomas using causal machine learning
Yang, E.; Agrawal, S.; Kinslow, C. J.; Cheng, S. K.; Yang, L.; Wang, E.; Wang, T. J.; Kachnic, L. A.; Brenner, D. J.; Shuryak, I.
Show abstract
Lower-grade gliomas (World Health Organization [WHO] grades 2-3) exhibit variable treatment responses, yet clinical decisions remain guided by population-level trial results. Standard causal survival forests estimate treatment effects at individual time horizons but lack methodology to synthesize these into interpretable temporal trajectories. Here, we apply the Causal Analysis of Survival Trajectories (CAST) framework, a recently developed extension of causal survival forests that synthesizes horizon-specific causal effect estimates into smooth temporal curves while accounting for between-horizon covariances via bootstrap estimation and Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage. We apply CAST to estimate time-varying, heterogeneous effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in 776 patients with lower-grade gliomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; n=512) and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA; n=264), analyzing six treatment-outcome scenarios and adjusting for age, sex, WHO grade, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status, 1p/19q codeletion, and extent of resection using elastic net propensity scores with overlap weighting. CAST curves reveal that chemotherapy provides consistent, sustained benefits across both cohorts; survival probability gains peak at 0.31 at 72-84 months for TCGA overall survival and 0.46 at 48 months for progression-free survival, with restricted mean survival time gains of 18.4 and 32.5 months at 10 years, respectively. CGGA chemotherapy shows delayed but large positive effects (survival probability peak 0.48 at 108 months). Radiotherapy effects are mixed, with modest E-values indicating sensitivity to residual confounding by indication. Subgroup CAST curves identify age at diagnosis as the dominant driver of treatment effect heterogeneity (46-56% of splits). All findings are robust to placebo permutation, simulated unobserved confounder, and negative control refutation tests. The CAST framework provides a general-purpose tool for temporal treatment effect visualization applicable beyond neuro-oncology.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.