Back

Genetic insights into immunothrombosis: from shared loci to repurposed drugs for autoimmune and thrombotic diseases

Long, Y.; Ou, Y.; Huang, G.; Tan, X.; Zhao, S.; Min, L.; Sun, C.; Luo, Z.; Pan, H.

2026-03-03 hematology
10.64898/2026.02.28.26346627 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveAutoimmune diseases (ADs) markedly elevate venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, yet the shared genetic architecture and tissue-specific regulatory mechanisms of this "Autoimmune-Thrombotic Axis" remain poorly defined. We aimed to characterize the genomic landscape of immunothrombosis to identify causal links and therapeutic targets. Approach and ResultsWe integrated large-scale GWAS data for VTE and 16 ADs using a multi-omics framework, including pleiotropy scanning, local genetic correlation, and summary-based Mendelian randomization (SMR). We identified 21 Immunothrombotic Shared Loci (ISLs) and 274 pleiotropic genes enriched in complement and coagulation cascades. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis revealed a robust causal effect of genetically predicted systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on VTE risk (OR = 1.018, 95% CI: 1.008-1.029, P = 0.0003). Mechanistically, IL6R and PLCL1 emerged as central mediators with distinct tissue-specific regulatory partitioning. Colocalization confirmed that shared genetic susceptibility is primarily driven by expression in arterial tissues (aorta and coronary) rather than exclusively in immune cells. Furthermore, the lead SNP rs4129267 was identified as a potential predictor for VTE in rheumatoid arthritis patients, and drug prioritization nominated TNF inhibitors as promising candidates for mitigating thrombotic burden. ConclusionThis study establishes the first genomic atlas of the autoimmune-thrombotic axis, demonstrating that vasculature-specific gene regulation drives immunothrombosis. These findings provide a biological basis for VTE risk stratification and suggest that genotype-guided therapy may optimize vascular outcomes in AD patients.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.