Back

Differential Methylation by Early Life Adversity in the Future of Families Child Wellbeing Study

Dumas Ang, S.; Chin, S.; Schneper, L. M.; Johnston, R. A.; Koss, K. J.; Mitchell, C.; Notterman, D. A.; Engelhardt, B. E.; Pena, C. J.

2026-02-28 genomics
10.64898/2026.02.27.708594 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Early life adversity (ELA) has a well-established link to mental health disorders later in life, yet the molecular mechanisms behind this relationship are incompletely understood. The Future of Families Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS) provides an opportunity to examine experience encoding in the genome through functional changes in DNA methylation (DNAm) in a cohort enriched in subjects exposed to ELA. We investigated epigenome-wide differences in DNAm across thirteen early-life exposures in salivary samples from FFCWS participants. We calculated differential methylation associations with disease-linked genetic variants, evaluated tissue-specific gene expression, and assessed the persistence of DNAm changes from ages 9 to 15 years. Using data from the mSTARR-seq assay, we characterized methylation-dependent regulatory activity. Differential methylation in the FFCWS validated prior results and identified new genomic regions associated with child adversity. Differential methylation occurs in genomic regions likely to impact gene expression, and affected genes are expressed in disease-relevant tissues. We also identified association of genetic variants associated with downstream disorders near differential methylation, including depression, alcohol and substance use, and anxiety disorders. Overall, cumulative ELA is associated with specific DNAm changes, functional regulation, and persistence over time. Our findings indicate that ELA-associated differential methylation in the FFCWS does not simply occur at random, but in genomic regions that are functional. Our results support the conclusion that altered DNAm represents a biological link between early life experience and later health outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 11%
14.1%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.3%
3
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 10%
4.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
7
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
10
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
11
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
12
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
14
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.6%
18
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Behavior Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
22
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
26
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
29
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%