Back

A crypt-operating DNA repair checkpoint for uncoupling regeneration and tumorigenesis

Ruez, R.; Radulovic, K.; Martinez-Torres, J.; Boulard, O.; Mound, A.; Paz Del Socorro, T.; Nigro, G.; Seillier-Turini, M.; Muharram, G.; Martinez-Garcia, J.; Gerbe, F.; Van Seuningen, I.; Carrier, A.; Jay, P.; Cochet, C.; Vincent, A.; Abbadie, C.; Sobhani, I.; Cochet, O.; De Oliveira Alves, N.; CHAMAILLARD, M.

2026-03-02 cell biology
10.64898/2026.02.27.708480 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The rapid turnover of the intestinal epithelium increases its vulnerability to genomic instability and environmental insults such as irradiation. Defects in DNA damage resolution can compromise epithelial regeneration, promote chronic tissue injury, and predispose to colorectal tumorigenesis. However, the intrinsic mechanisms that coordinate DNA repair with epithelial regeneration at the crypt level remain poorly defined. Here, we identify the Nod-like receptor protein 6 (Nlrp6) as a key epithelial regulator of genome surveillance and regenerative control in intestinal crypts. Nlrp6 is strategically expressed in crypt base columnar cells, where it preserves crypt homeostasis by restraining proliferation under genotoxic stress conditions. Loss of Nlrp6 in crypt base columnar cells results in uncontrolled oncogenic stress, defective epithelial regeneration, and accumulation of unrepaired DNA damage, features associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Conversely, aberrant Nlrp6 overexpression induces cytoplasmic retention of Csnk2 catalytic subunits, limiting their nuclear availability when DNA repair is required. These findings position Nlrp6 as a non-canonical, cell-intrinsic surveillance mechanism that links DNA damage responses to epithelial regeneration through Csnk2-dependent signaling. Collectively, our study reveals a crypt-intrinsic DNA repair pathway that governs epithelial regeneration and disease outcomes, providing new insight into how genome instability and regenerative failure contribute to colorectal cancer progression.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
14.1%
2
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.3%
5
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.9%
7
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.0%
8
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.3%
9
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
13
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
16
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
19
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
27
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%