Back

Seminal fluid proteins can mitigate sexual conflict: the case of remating in insects

Michalak, P.; Duneau, D.; Ferdy, J.-B.

2026-02-27 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.27.708467 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Males during mating never transfer just sperm; to the best of our knowledge, they always deliver a rich seminal fluid as well. The proteins in the seminal fluid have an important sperm supporting role, but they also cause changes in the female physiology and can impose a mating cost. The associated costs and delay in the time of remating, lead to the view that those proteins evolved primarily due to sexual conflict and delay female remating beyond the optimal rate. To examine the role of seminal fluid proteins in sexual conflict we use a mathematical model of reproductive physiology, informed by the accumulated knowledge on Drosophila melanogaster. In accordance with the theory, we find that males always benefit from inducing longer remating intervals in females. But, we also find that this conflict is reduced when female reproduction is regulated by the male proteins. Without seminal fluid proteins females have a single, well-defined, optimal remating rate. However, when seminal proteins are used to regulate females reproduction, females can reach the same offspring production for a range of mating intervals. This wider range of possible remating times could provide females with a buffer against uncertain mating opportunity. It could also allow females to be more selective on male quality, by reducing the cost associated with delaying remating. Our results suggest that, while there is a conflict over the remating rate, seminal fluid proteins reduce its intensity, highlighting their role in aligning the interests of both sexes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.2%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.2%
5
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
6
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.8%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
10
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
12
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
14
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
17
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
21
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
25
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%