Back

Morphological characterization of moulting in the Atlantic horseshoecrab Limulus polyphemus: phylogenetic conservation amongchelicerates and evolutionary convergence of ecdysis linked to headshield patterns

Kim, K. M.; Lynch, S.; Drage, H. B.; Antcliffe, J.; Chipman, A.; Daley, A. C.; Robinson-Rechavi, M.

2026-02-27 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.27.708456 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Arthropods must periodically moult their exoskeleton to permit growth, a conserved developmental process whose morphological and behavioural execution varies widely among lineages. Horseshoe crabs (Limulidae) are members of Xiphosura, a chelicerate lineage with a fossil record extending as far back as the Ordovician and provide a valuable comparative framework for studying the evolution of moulting strategies in Arthropoda. Despite their importance, detailed morphological characterization of moulting in horseshoe crabs remains scarce, limiting developmental studies and broader comparative analyses. Here, we provide a detailed morphological characterization of the moulting process in the Atlantic horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus. Morphological changes in specific anatomical structures, including the anterior margin of the prosoma, lateral spines and dorsal spinous process of the opisthosoma, were observed during the moulting process. By tracking these morphological markers, such as retraction of the epidermis from the cuticle and degree of corrugation of the epidermis, we were able to identify individuals in the early and late pre-moult stage, predict the onset of ecdysis, and distinguish post-moult and intermoult stages. We compare ecdysis patterns in L. polyphemus with other arthropod taxa, both extant and fossil. We find that, despite differences in behavioural execution, ecdysis in L. polyphemus shares features with other chelicerates, and that both phylogenetic signal and convergent patterns are evident across Arthropoda. This study offers a robust, non-invasive method for determining moult stages in juvenile horseshoe crabs and provides insights into diversity and constraints of ecdysis in Arthropoda.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.9%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.1%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
4
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
5
EvoDevo
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
8
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.4%
12
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
13
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.8%
15
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.6%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
19
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
24
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
30
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%