Back

Human landscape modification shapes foraging preferences and sucrose responsiveness of honey bees in Asia

Alin Jacob, G.; Ravi, M.; Bhaskar, S.; Arra, A.; Somanathan, H.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Scheiner, R.

2026-03-02 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.27.708048 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Landscape composition is central in shaping how pollinators utilise floral resources, yet its influence on foraging behaviour of co-occurring Asian honey bees remains underexplored. Resolving this gap is crucial to understand how closely-related, native and introduced species maintain foraging efficiency in rapidly changing environments. We investigated nectar preferences, sucrose responsiveness, and foraging task partitioning in three co-occurring honey bee species in India: Apis florea (native open-nesting), Apis cerana (native cavity-nesting), and Apis mellifera (introduced cavity-nesting), across forest, agricultural, and urban landscapes. Landscape type strongly influenced crop sugar concentrations of honey bees. While all species collected high-concentration nectar in forests, A. mellifera and A. cerana collected lower concentrations than A. florea in urban habitats. A. florea showed consistent preference for high-concentration nectar across landscapes. Complementing this, sucrose responsiveness assays revealed a lower responsiveness of A. florea compared to cavity-nesting species. Foraging task partitioning differed among species, but interestingly, also among landscapes. While A. cerana predominantly collected nectar, A. mellifera foraged equally for pollen, nectar and water, and A. florea shifted task allocation across landscapes. In conclusion, we provide the first comparative evidence that landscape composition and species characteristics jointly shape foraging preferences and organisation of foraging labour in Asian honey bees.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
2
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.7%
5
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
7
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
10
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
14
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
21
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
26
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Journal of Economic Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%