Back

A multi-scale model to evaluate airport wastewater surveillance and ICU genomic monitoring for pandemic preparedness

Reddy, B. K.; Tsui, J. L.- H.; Drake, K. O.; St-Onge, G.; Davis, J. T.; Mills, C.; Dunning, J.; Bogoch, I. I.; Scarpino, S. V.; Bhatt, S.; Pybus, O. G.; Rambaut, A.; Wade, M. J.; Ward, T.; Chand, M.; Volz, E. M.; Vespignani, A.; Kraemer, M. U. G.

2026-03-02 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.27.26347250 medRxiv
Show abstract

Increasing human mobility and population connectivity have intensified the risks of global pathogen spread, while concurrent shifts in human demographic patterns, ecological factors, and climatic conditions have altered the global landscape of this risk. Genomic surveillance can serve as a critical tool for early detection of emerging pathogen threats; however, challenges remain in deciding where to monitor, in understanding trade-offs among surveillance modalities, and in translating detections into actionable estimates of importation and local transmission for public health decision-making. Here we develop a computational framework to evaluate strategies for respiratory pathogen detection that integrates an established clinical surveillance modality, intensive care unit (ICU) sampling, with an emerging environmental modality, aircraft wastewater (AWW) sampling. Detections are translated into risk via a multi-scale, stochastic global transmission model that combines international flight data with a detailed agent-based local transmission model. The resulting model-based estimates contrast the time to pathogen detection via AWW at airports with that in the community via realistic healthcare testing pathways. Using real-world data from England and Wales (EW), we find that employing AWW in EW airports can improve first detection times by 12.5-37.7 days for a range of epidemiological parameters under realistic healthcare testing scenarios and random aircraft sampling between 25 and 50%. In particular, for a SARS-CoV-2-like pathogen, we expect AWW to outperform ICU in first detection timing by 22.0-25.6 days, with [~]21.9-42.6 times fewer cases at their respective time of detection. While false detection remains a risk, we show that follow-up confirmatory testing can improve detection confidence substantially. Together our results demonstrate the potential utility of AWW surveillance and how it can reduce detection times and improve global health security.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
5
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
7
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
8
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
12
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
19
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%