A multi-scale model to evaluate airport wastewater surveillance and ICU genomic monitoring for pandemic preparedness
Reddy, B. K.; Tsui, J. L.- H.; Drake, K. O.; St-Onge, G.; Davis, J. T.; Mills, C.; Dunning, J.; Bogoch, I. I.; Scarpino, S. V.; Bhatt, S.; Pybus, O. G.; Rambaut, A.; Wade, M. J.; Ward, T.; Chand, M.; Volz, E. M.; Vespignani, A.; Kraemer, M. U. G.
Show abstract
Increasing human mobility and population connectivity have intensified the risks of global pathogen spread, while concurrent shifts in human demographic patterns, ecological factors, and climatic conditions have altered the global landscape of this risk. Genomic surveillance can serve as a critical tool for early detection of emerging pathogen threats; however, challenges remain in deciding where to monitor, in understanding trade-offs among surveillance modalities, and in translating detections into actionable estimates of importation and local transmission for public health decision-making. Here we develop a computational framework to evaluate strategies for respiratory pathogen detection that integrates an established clinical surveillance modality, intensive care unit (ICU) sampling, with an emerging environmental modality, aircraft wastewater (AWW) sampling. Detections are translated into risk via a multi-scale, stochastic global transmission model that combines international flight data with a detailed agent-based local transmission model. The resulting model-based estimates contrast the time to pathogen detection via AWW at airports with that in the community via realistic healthcare testing pathways. Using real-world data from England and Wales (EW), we find that employing AWW in EW airports can improve first detection times by 12.5-37.7 days for a range of epidemiological parameters under realistic healthcare testing scenarios and random aircraft sampling between 25 and 50%. In particular, for a SARS-CoV-2-like pathogen, we expect AWW to outperform ICU in first detection timing by 22.0-25.6 days, with [~]21.9-42.6 times fewer cases at their respective time of detection. While false detection remains a risk, we show that follow-up confirmatory testing can improve detection confidence substantially. Together our results demonstrate the potential utility of AWW surveillance and how it can reduce detection times and improve global health security.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlling COVID-19 via test-trace-quarantine 96%
- Assessing the impact of SARS-CoV-2 prevention measures in Austrian schools by means of agent-based simulations calibrated to cluster tracing data 96%
- Using high-resolution contact networks to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 transmission and control in large-scale multi-day events 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying Asymptomatic Infection and Transmission of COVID-19 in New York City using Observed Cases, Serology and Testing Capacity 95%
- Dynamic Prioritization of COVID-19 Vaccines When Social Distancing is Limited for Essential Workers 94%
- Beyond Six Feet: A Guideline to Limit Indoor Airborne Transmission of COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing COVID-19 control with asymptomatic surveillance testing in a university environment 96%
- Enhanced testing can substantially improve defence against several types of respiratory virus pandemic 95%
- Predicting the impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical intervention on short- and medium-term dynamics of enterovirus D68 in the US 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.