Back

Quantified Brain Atrophy and Risk of Severe Mass Effect in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Du, Y.; Altaf, A. Z.; Ibrahim, N. J.; Chatzidakis, S.; Malinger, L. A.; Reinert, A. L.; Stafford, R.; Kumar, A.; Avula, A.; Abdalkader, M.; Cheng, H.; Greer, D. M.; Dhar, R.; Ong, C.

2026-03-04 neurology
10.64898/2026.02.27.26346805 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLarge middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarctions can result in life-threatening cerebral edema. Quantitative brain atrophy may improve risk stratification for severe edema. We examined whether quantitative brain atrophy is associated with severe midline shift after large ischemic stroke and whether incorporating atrophy improves prediction beyond established clinical and radiographic predictors. MethodsThis was a retrospective observational cohort study of patients with [&ge;][1/2] MCA ischemic infarction, presentation within 24 hours of last known well, and at least one follow-up head CT, admitted to two academic hospitals with comprehensive stroke centers between 2006 and 2024. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of both centers. Brain atrophy was quantified as the inverse of standardized brain volume on admission head CT. The primary outcome was severe radiographic mass effect, defined as midline shift [&ge;]5 mm on follow-up CT. The secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable regression models assessed associations between quantified atrophy and outcomes. Incremental prognostic value was evaluated by comparing models with and without atrophy using measures of goodness of fit, calibration, and discrimination. ResultsAmong 565 patients (mean age 67.5{+/-}15.7 years; 49.9% female), 223 (39.5%) developed severe mass effect. Greater atrophy was associated with lower odds of midline shift [&ge;]5 mm (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34-0.58), but not with in-hospital mortality. Incorporation of atrophy significantly improved prediction of severe mass effect compared to the baseline model (likelihood ratio test {chi}{superscript 2} (1) = 41, p <0.001; AIC 703 vs. 741; BIC 733 vs. 767; AUC 0.68 vs. 0.60). ConclusionsQuantified brain atrophy is independently associated with a reduced risk of severe mass effect after large MCA stroke and improved the performance of established predictive models. Incorporation of this imaging biomarker may enhance early risk stratification, monitoring, and intervention planning for patients at risk of life-threatening cerebral edema.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.3%
2
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
8
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
10
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
11
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
12
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%